IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 October 2010 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079BE3A67EB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.461
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.461 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.138, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2qQ9mChbOJS for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201AE3A67B6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so1485982qwb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=wYSuSQ9qBbydMjUkLcq4oDUxmIN2TXR8MGf0vMn7joE=; b=uAoo/L+0JsI+nFo7Uoo6O26bsKwDBW0oDgkxhqQPU/PcpvrvS8n5lowdXfjX6Eia+w G6/x+5uGI+amld7NvIm6SVOk0cLv3FZtp06H2fJK/VKGFIAC5oIcXTPm6oaK4R5gY1aV CjlN76bHR5jQ0q5eEsEVN8kUsdzM90rwb9jzw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=jMijLniXU7aSFKETdB0yt/5n8n76yQhjW1yYH7vxKhILSb0ZPuSNuKoktcvr1Q/C9b 0My3rE0SKCFuEcy3JfK4xPOSA8+iwLHp3lOEprCXaAClxU1X15PtfR1pmLCIKYWxDXKk WzoQMNBAXqLu+L9NBfdRSyqKcMrUyhNJxxZLg=
Received: by 10.229.109.213 with SMTP id k21mr9957008qcp.69.1288229818225; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bxb-rdroms-8712.cisco.com (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ew4sm238035vcb.47.2010.10.27.18.36.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 18:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CC6E83B.9010808@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:36:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D30403EC-7385-406C-A88C-40AD5B0B89BA@gmail.com>
References: <20101026024811.BD2AD5AC74F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <665140E6-F4EF-4F7E-8973-984CF3096694@standardstrack.com> <4CC6E63D.6080703@dcrocker.net> <4CC6E83B.9010808@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:42:47 -0000

I'll take the contrarian position.

Demonstrate to me that the barriers for PS really are higher than they used to be.

- Ralph

On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:39 AM 10/26/10, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 26.10.2010 16:31, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> ...
>> This seems to be the core idea driving support for this specification.
>> 
>> Unfortunately, there is nothing in the proposed change that will affect
>> this goal.
>> 
>> The idea seems to be that "simplifying" the later part of the labeling
>> model will somehow cause those controlling production of an initial
>> version of a spec to get it produced more quickly.
>> ...
> 
> Maybe some of the current IESG members could offer their opinion about *why* the barriers for PS appear to be much higher than they used to be?
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email