IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 02 September 2011 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA20A21F8A30 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTPOpbjs+142 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276C921F8DB7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EBE20174; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:34:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:34:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=S3O ctGMbqJaDdWuSqSkGHEX6WhY=; b=ijLZevYZcLoWcpgF1uRySMYUXQDeSYWLKdq p94aDwenb5MitI8vdLepceJ3QaebJUq3cKoqg7DNKCrGjqbgkhcgZAsy4rPmgaGi RQMiRQ9e/CbpocV5KM9H81p4OloHJ3LRZq64bKS8BxDFcvDd987xmpZJ9xxORcUW I7/fH8tI=
X-Sasl-enc: fsBWrE9rRE4CdEEJTXN9Kf0KDPBn787p4QRKbhdpU4Du 1314999294
Received: from [10.59.20.166] (209-145-67-24.unassigned.ntelos.net [209.145.67.24]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2BC1FB21E89; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:34:54 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-143--462839055"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C349D75F42@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:34:53 -0400
Message-Id: <197BAAF4-B98F-4C7C-BC48-E311869CFE28@network-heretics.com>
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <85BEBBFE35549CAF8000DCE9@PST.JCK.COM> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C349D75F42@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:35:48 -0000

On Sep 2, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Ross Callon wrote:

> Two things that I don't seem to have picked up on: (i) Any consensus that a 3 step process is better than a 2 step process; (ii) Any hint of moving towards an agreement on other things that we might do to improve the process. 

(iii) Any consensus that a 2 step process is better than a 3 step process.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email