IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Wed, 07 July 2010 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E6C3A680B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lcZAbHQYGkYW for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372863A684D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.88] (ppp-68-122-72-44.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.72.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o67FZuis000763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:36:01 -0700
Message-ID: <4C349ED8.6080706@bbiw.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:35:52 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
References: <20070.1278510136@erosen-linux> <4C3498CF.90206@dcrocker.net> <4C349E0E.7030904@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C349E0E.7030904@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:36:04 -0000

On 7/7/2010 8:32 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 07.07.2010 17:10, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> ...
>> Right. Personally, I think it's fine to include a normative reference to
>> something jotted down on a napkin. So I don't understand the fuss about
>> citing Internet-Drafts.
>> ...
>
> As long as the napkin has got a URI stable enough to be accepted by the RFC
> Editor...


As long as it doesn't require emotional stability, that seems reasonable.

But come to think of it, what is 'stable enough'?

Anything that Eric deems reasonable?  At that brief moment in time?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email