IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 26 October 2010 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAAD3A69CB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHmtDX8dnrM6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m1.imap-partners.net (m1.imap-partners.net [64.13.152.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9483A69C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net (184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net [184.200.45.132]) by m1.imap-partners.net (MOS 4.1.8-GA) with ESMTP id CIC55603 (AUTH admin@network-heretics.com); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:44:37 -0700
X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 184.200.45.132 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net <moore@network-heretics.com> 5 none
X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 184.200.45.132 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net <moore@network-heretics.com> 5 none
X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 184.200.45.132 184-200-45-132.pools.spcsdns.net <moore@network-heretics.com> 5 none
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101026124119.785EF5B29B7@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:44:38 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <7461D4A4-0AAA-47AA-A562-65AC80D38DA1@network-heretics.com>
References: <20101026124119.785EF5B29B7@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:42:57 -0000

On Oct 26, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:

> I think it is better to not fiddle, even if the current documents
> do not paint an accurate picture, I think we need to be serious
> when changing our basic rules.

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email