IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 02 September 2011 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5982721F8D7F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0P9VLddXs8l for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B50C21F8D71 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 16:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so2236984fxe.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LG0j6Ef6a4/6tbktGJhBKOHliTzpPmRVnDyjR/njbd0=; b=KF31PQ+8aj/vkERS4cCy286d4ajZursX3POhTA8RghqPeIzkteboNBc9lunfmyC0zM VbMMCKEe7F6B0yZVbiHquKFOn/PWBNsLuICXc9AjpNYDtHh1CeSfyo+/FAy6x6mjsFO1 vT45tWUpWHq5MFnnH+G74DTA/mIuLnb7/0Rp0=
Received: by 10.223.34.91 with SMTP id k27mr2413289fad.133.1315006946111; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.4] ([121.98.251.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c12sm314667fad.14.2011.09.02.16.42.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E6169D4.6070206@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 11:42:12 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <85BEBBFE35549CAF8000DCE9@PST.JCK.COM> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C349D75F42@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C349D75F42@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 23:40:50 -0000

On 2011-09-03 09:29, Ross Callon wrote:
...
> I think that we should go to a "two maturity level" process, be done with this little step, and also enthusiastically encourage people to write drafts that propose *other* changes to the process. Then at least we can be debating something different 6 months from now than we were debating last year. 

+1. Let's please not hear all over again the arguments that were made during
the *concluded* last call. The consensus is rough; time to move on.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email