IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> Tue, 26 October 2010 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767E83A68EF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.672, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uGxcrtokXF9B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBAC3A68EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77677 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2010 02:44:00 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 26 Oct 2010 02:44:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=df32.4cc64070.k1010; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=MCB1KBDeG9ZPH4NNw0xzrb5WA8lU7OlMm/JIoTKTZb4=; b=VMwz7av+pmqMmSGFV8ILAoMoECrTe55ImA+bicX23vi10z40nFmKP5BZUvwQycMLpuBH5teVGA9I1u5OMZ+0l4K3AYikX43or2mlOcIVbrLm6kNJHw8NRrO1zGlFr3qhfchWJiyk4+ZOXyRlJu06A8ohrnrN7n4TbLoP3qFjIoM=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:44:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20101026024400.57137.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
In-Reply-To: <4CC6224B.5060300@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:42:16 -0000

>I am happy to agree to what the draft currently says. We've sliced
>and diced this many times over the years, and this seems very close to the
>least-unpopular view. That's the best we can hope for, imho.

+1

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email