IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 01 September 2010 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBF03A6A16 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.608
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s9TjnzjfA5w9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578DF3A6910 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7F79A4775 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rg-UYLiJitLv for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:01:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.101] (pool-96-231-149-87.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.231.149.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121FE9A4726 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 16:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C7EB142.3030209@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:02:10 -0400
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
References: <20070.1278510136@erosen-linux> <4C3498CF.90206@dcrocker.net> <4C349E0E.7030904@gmx.de> <4C349ED8.6080706@bbiw.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C349ED8.6080706@bbiw.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:01:36 -0000

Dear IETF community:

I just posted an update to draft-housley-two-maturity-levels.  I tried
to reflect what I heard during the plenary discussion in Maastricht.
Please review and comment.

Thanks,
Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email