IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Who raised the bar? [Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels]

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Wed, 07 September 2011 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C6121F8BF0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.538
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hTxEh8skuFVc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41A521F8BEB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=849; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1315378157; x=1316587757; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GRVSEgQyPPJMMAQykbPSVACaPMac18+WikPqm2iUPaY=; b=HlHIzLp5cSnoXvy0L07rcDFSYDI6QgbFuzOXzmbSbEjb7SBPWwRWqzv6 AowSnHAVde8IfJxNfmm2Pc92MzfoMG08geSRngMAQxslqodKqz4cBKTVq +pbyR8Crmcpigg4fxQJNcFs4c6+sS2LFQ+3qAG8Udog0+DXBKJZZFjUr/ A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAHQTZ06rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABCqAx4gUYBAQEBAgEBAQEPASc0CwULCxguJzAGEyKHUwSXPgGeT4YLYASTL4USCYt6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,343,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="597634"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2011 06:49:16 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p876nGMZ030852; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:49:16 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:49:16 -0700
Received: from [10.60.114.231] ([10.60.114.231]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:49:15 -0700
Subject: Re: Who raised the bar? [Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E669828.1090304@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:49:14 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <669C796C-EBF3-47BB-AA71-CA5AAE1E386A@cisco.com>
References: <20110728121904.2D22AD7A76F@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <4E5D4570.9080108@piuha.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20110902090159.09e97af0@resistor.net> <4E6147D4.2020204@santronics.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C352657343@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <20110906161108.GI31240@shinkuro.com> <CEDD8840-BE2D-405E-872A-271C25A9A59D@network-heretics.com> <01O5QFMUPV8S014O5Z@mauve.mrochek.com> <CA+9kkMBig=Oe=3x=G-8YVsd49buGNWX2vmAY3wj7dVgtjf9p5g@mail.gmail.com> <4E669828.1090304@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Sep 2011 06:49:16.0019 (UTC) FILETIME=[4297A430:01CC6D2A]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:47:03 -0700
Cc: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:47:28 -0000

On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
> ...
>> My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize that
>> the previous PS moved into "WG draft" years ago and that anything named an
>> RFC should be recognized as something that market will consider a standard.
> 
> And who raised the bar? It wasn't the IESG, it was the market, and more
> specifically the product managers and IT managers who adopted RFC conformance
> as their criterion.
> 
> I'm a bit fed up with the IESG being blamed for this, rather than being
> congratulated on adapting to it.

Completely agree !

JP.

> 
>   Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email