Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-03.txtRe: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-03.txt
Shumon Huque
2024-03-16
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/sK_pUFbyQGPFLgq4yIVMDvbIkQU/
3437681
2122623
Re: [DNSOP] The DO bit - was Re: [Ext] Re: signing parent-side NS (was: Re: Updating RFC 7344 for cross-NS consistency)Re: [DNSOP] The DO bit - was Re: [Ext] Re: signing parent-side NS (was: Re: Updating RFC 7344 for cross-NS consistency)
Paul Wouters
2022-07-29
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/zIw7CWnTAIe_ut-9AB3n7Jf9a1s/
3206628
2023215
[DNSOP] The DO bit - was Re: [Ext] Re: signing parent-side NS (was: Re: Updating RFC 7344 for cross-NS consistency)[DNSOP] The DO bit - was Re: [Ext] Re: signing parent-side NS (was: Re: Updating RFC 7344 for cross-NS consistency)
Edward Lewis
2022-07-29
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/eM5v8nUB3wR_Kn0BOwEoslgECn4/
3206611
2023215
Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpsRe: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
Petr Špaček
2021-04-09
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/E28PsfAUquCgKEWXqP4x9sWYT6Q/
3019579
1944740
Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpsRe: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
Ben Schwartz
2021-04-08
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/9_GXre5UVskG3VVguTVfnDzggN0/
3019245
1944740
Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpsRe: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
Petr Špaček
2021-04-08
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/EnlTvi2bM9syQBCTbxF1hBro55Y/
3019113
1944740
Re: [DNSOP] commenting draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01Re: [DNSOP] commenting draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01
Daniel Migault
2020-03-19
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/mRV5dD5FCn5AU5b3qhj8_RzBhLE/
2854287
1880513
Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current PracticeRe: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
Warren Kumari
2020-03-11
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/kfU3sCRwkPwRKBwXotrh6F0SmxE/
2850397
1870094
Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current PracticeRe: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
Warren Kumari
2020-03-11
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/XsbFVwkko4Neg2BcXkkM4mv7r3c/
2850395
1870094
Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current PracticeRe: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
Mark Andrews
2020-03-10
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/DrDcbbsAQ79TZfrpYiZzBXBAK3k/
2849599
1870094
Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current PracticeRe: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
Warren Kumari
2020-03-10
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/C2jYIuVjc92YWkEOzF3V-RS9KSM/
2849036
1870094
Re: [DNSOP] commenting draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01Re: [DNSOP] commenting draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01
Ben Schwartz
2020-03-10
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/WcIVBe2nDMCvvuk3PadKznxT35M/
2848598
1880513
[DNSOP] commenting draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01[DNSOP] commenting draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01
Daniel Migault
2020-02-27
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/0G5C8hARFk96joqaUTMY4UIh6dY/
2841204
1880513
Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current PracticeRe: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
Warren Kumari
2020-01-13
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/g3WNzNMNg6OKXc79LRpavhPAo1k/
2824369
1870094
Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current PracticeRe: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
Warren Kumari
2019-12-20
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/UzSRmcq9VwzSz8H983K-Hu89DRo/
2819072
1870094
[DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice[DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
The IESG
2019-12-06
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/GKXRX6nmYQjk5tYxrf679MNWWLo/
2813730
1870094
Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current PracticeLast Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt> (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice
The IESG
2019-12-06
ietf-announce
None
/arch/msg/ietf-announce/V-4RJ5XLl8KEuE46xNyv0V9ElMM/
2813731
1870095
[homenet] simple-naming-03: terminology[homenet] simple-naming-03: terminology
STARK, BARBARA H
2018-11-07
homenet
None
/arch/msg/homenet/YeH4hqWU6zMrim0aVWiIwUC4Ndc/
2656801
1814513
Re: [dns-privacy] review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-11: we should revert DNSSEC validation requirementRe: [dns-privacy] review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-11: we should revert DNSSEC validation requirement
Antoine Germanos
2017-12-02
dns-privacy
None
/arch/msg/dns-privacy/D88v-74QyQY3Nw7-PEVUVuyWzX4/
2516647
1753201
Re: [dns-privacy] review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-11: we should revert DNSSEC validation requirementRe: [dns-privacy] review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-11: we should revert DNSSEC validation requirement
Paul Wouters
2017-10-30
dns-privacy
None
/arch/msg/dns-privacy/aECKSw5dO085r-Mj1a9WO18gHQM/
2501673
1753201
Re: [dns-privacy] review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-11: we should revert DNSSEC validation requirementRe: [dns-privacy] review of draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-11: we should revert DNSSEC validation requirement
Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
2017-10-30
dns-privacy
None
/arch/msg/dns-privacy/_6SWtJb7te_pwDXDZ7gsc_UVCRs/
2501669
1753201
[DNSOP] Authoritative Servers and the AD bit[DNSOP] Authoritative Servers and the AD bit
Peter DeVries
2016-06-09
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/SZu-QO6zwHqS7hhYprNnKAUXCa4/
2221277
1130074
Re: [DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"Re: [DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"
Mark Andrews
2015-03-10
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/qvrwxM5yg9UP3DvIo_oUjTuyM20/
1911670
1130621
Re: [DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"Re: [DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"
Willem Toorop
2015-03-09
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/NmQA9FZl3nhDcPO4PLgKCh99VIM/
1910768
1130621
Re: [DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"Re: [DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"
Ralf Weber
2015-03-08
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/fwDqT7qomhZLndWnqcuskjY8oxk/
1910282
1130621
[DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"[DNSOP] Definition of "validating resolver"
Paul Hoffman
2015-03-08
dnsop
None
/arch/msg/dnsop/t4_HUy3eTt4xkvN-iY5f-_NCeyk/
1910227
1130621
Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bisRe: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis
Mark Andrews
2015-03-05
ietf
None
/arch/msg/ietf/0rnt4RlaH6CW0Uwcbgao-pEW9sM/
1908868
1340189
Re: [v6ops] Different DNS servers depending on dual stack or single stack usageRe: [v6ops] Different DNS servers depending on dual stack or single stack usage
Daniel Roesen
2012-08-01
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/w2TO0-y3M_FvIE-5gWYS39IeEIM/
1488826
1660273
Re: [dnsext] AD bitRe: [dnsext] AD bit
Alfred Hönes
2012-03-08
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/VrrC8raixnw5EQg2lScYshnRreI/
1008013
1505635
Re: [dnsext] AD bitRe: [dnsext] AD bit
Alfred Hönes
2012-03-08
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/4rBDQpDcHLpd0LWSh1bOmetgWTQ/
371019
1127573
[dnsext] Publication request: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt[dnsext] Publication request: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-02-16
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/7ubVPGrzC1wW70L_viv-NRxWjlo/
1007979
1505644
[dnsext] Publication request: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt[dnsext] Publication request: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt
Olafur Gudmundsson
2012-02-16
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/A72J0HYd1EaKZwpOzWN_C6RV8ro/
370986
1127581
[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3226 (2810)[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3226 (2810)
RFC Errata System
2011-05-18
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/NxjxNaBfbmSh4jjdBt5ZvYm8EYg/
1007017
1505753
[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3226 (2810)[dnsext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3226 (2810)
RFC Errata System
2011-05-18
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/stIHOIR9PIYHf-3tBLFNeK_-QX8/
370028
1127690
Re: [dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responsesRe: [dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responses
Samuel Weiler
2010-03-08
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/WMQ-a0M02-D035vVgjxkf8AD3eQ/
1003570
1506196
Re: [dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responsesRe: [dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responses
Samuel Weiler
2010-03-08
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/hKgQLdrLoXvQ9gAy7gYxH8XRdqc/
366113
1128664
[dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responses[dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responses
Roy Arends
2009-11-23
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/dWLHLTpJguNhbox-LWPGUN_APuc/
1002656
1506196
[dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responses[dnsext] DNSSEC OK bit in responses
Roy Arends
2009-11-23
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/KbfysgVv3euYQ-WtLdxe8bphy5o/
364369
1128664
Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bitRe: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit
Ray.Bellis
2009-06-18
namedroppers
None
/arch/msg/namedroppers/9az_WTnvrZG38HlPXKCsmqPcUl4/
1001074
1506360
Re: [dnsext] New rules for DO bitRe: [dnsext] New rules for DO bit
Ray.Bellis
2009-06-18
dnsext
None
/arch/msg/dnsext/3cMMKWJ5bScehBSgbTtXqXnhpns/
362343
1129060