Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Brotman, Alex
2024-03-23
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/bKNA9l0pGc436OLZgnMXPZvZQ_E/
3441803
2120979
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Matthäus Wander
2024-03-22
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/bpzjOo9afP4h0Wtu7Vl8qt5ClDk/
3441643
2120979
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Matthäus Wander
2024-03-21
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/75Rjlmjv_ioO2sRBepYBxejuADo/
3441123
2120979
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/KwFPlR3SNjg7W45LdbVI5_dvJBk/
3437101
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Hector Santos
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/K3TW-XMktmmvgt087C-hZtf_Jvc/
3437092
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/PNyz6qFx1i6MrllEquq9tbXuNgY/
3437072
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Hector Santos
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Bv4GcuxnRC4tOou0EYYNpKvpe34/
3437064
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/s-rucCHKKW_Mi6cS78xsjWWKnjE/
3437043
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/K_HVL5VVm6oFXc3NY_GZLrDBwXE/
3437034
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/CH3DB-5pe-FL_rX2-31T4oll9NQ/
3437027
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Pvo-4FuSpo70ESKgyz402hGo444/
3436998
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/82NQsNIq-AE3mn4iYZwYaev7FWg/
3436974
2124276
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/S6C28B5JWORxHIUZNy58XeArSe0/
3436964
2124276
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Douglas Foster
2024-03-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/UDqd7eJMUdvqoRujbEfDVwQs5mM/
3436938
2124008
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Todd Herr
2024-03-13
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fRw-lCmcCdpSptePnT5OE9vHukI/
3436535
2124008
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Douglas Foster
2024-03-13
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/aDrmqCSw_poz0lKDg9m_xTaqhpU/
3436493
2124008
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Tobias Herkula
2024-03-13
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/coVeMF-m9HmPmOUgZQyqgdTqGIo/
3436488
2124008
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignmentRe: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Murray S. Kucherawy
2024-03-12
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ur1s5RJ7waHenrtmTd8hI6f6KPg/
3436300
2124008
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF adviceRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Hector Santos
2024-03-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/2gu6-AjzKnNVhLdxPZKcoeJn1Uc/
3435077
2122861
[dmarc-ietf] SHOULD (was Re: Another point for SPF advice)[dmarc-ietf] SHOULD (was Re: Another point for SPF advice)
Murray S. Kucherawy
2024-03-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Ypf20t8t4W04AyuAA1inSjBfXmU/
3435036
2122861
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF adviceRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZhlzNjw_BMdwD2zlKlXbcw8-iI4/
3434946
2122861
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF adviceRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Scott Kitterman
2024-03-05
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/e7-n78E_ddIHcifq3NJHAuhls0o/
3433514
2122861
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF adviceRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-05
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/n9uJxDRiSFtP0dBs1uLbST7VRws/
3433503
2122861
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF adviceRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Todd Herr
2024-03-05
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/dFQ-eky3h1fU9PIjuy2NjDZzgFU/
3433463
2122861
[dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice[dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-05
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/AomlBTNyvFxHQ-PDchJvtfTU9zk/
3433454
2122861
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DISCARD: 4.3. Authentication MechanismsRe: [dmarc-ietf] DISCARD: 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-04
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/4-s7VO7unmhlkhrKeMBJw-eegrs/
3432292
2122137
[dmarc-ietf] 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms[dmarc-ietf] 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms
Alessandro Vesely
2024-03-04
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Tw_gY_ss4SR3xJZR0Z0nTr9ha2I/
3432290
2122137
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
John C Klensin
2024-02-05
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/wkoynEHeuyD9j-Jr4zrI8H2TL7s/
3419595
2107503
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
Alice Russo
2024-02-05
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/UeagYluoKhRKLP5tDEHsdFm5CW0/
3419585
2107503
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
Murray S. Kucherawy
2024-02-03
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/0ZOWn2so2X24mpTbUKMYxw_hS9c/
3418856
2107503
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
Alice Russo
2024-02-01
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/ldHlZNWOV2kqONsgAu3W_mLDJDQ/
3418197
2107503
Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
Alice Russo
2024-01-25
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/KbKhz6wgYRZGRbykHfxbSdVPXeM/
3410752
2107503
[Emailcore] rfc5321bis-25 (was: Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-23)[Emailcore] rfc5321bis-25 (was: Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-23)
John C Klensin
2024-01-24
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/qr6WZyszjxsS1DrvrxiqKaQ52js/
3410251
2102889
Re: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your reviewRe: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
John C Klensin
2024-01-23
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/7EyHSb9GzxZPW7SlHf3C9bwNTRg/
3409562
2107503
[auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review[auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
Alice Russo
2024-01-22
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/DwHOfHl9kWicfd6dA8AcfQy91BQ/
3408999
2107503
Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your reviewRe: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9422 <draft-freed-smtp-limits-07> for your review
John C Klensin
2024-01-20
auth48archive
None
/arch/msg/auth48archive/1rWQGbsmwiW-jq0Na8dXmNZhsmo/
3408125
2107503
Re: [Emailcore] SMTP HELP, was SmugglingRe: [Emailcore] SMTP HELP, was Smuggling
John C Klensin
2023-12-28
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/FF83Egp2kOG6cBRR6fAnPHt3TC8/
3399611
2104145
Re: [Emailcore] SMTP HELP, was SmugglingRe: [Emailcore] SMTP HELP, was Smuggling
Hector Santos
2023-12-28
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/q55Kx5PWZuOp0akoUYeo3b23NHA/
3399590
2104145
Re: [Emailcore] SMTP HELP, was SmugglingRe: [Emailcore] SMTP HELP, was Smuggling
John Levine
2023-12-28
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/Uxw3oi7hVAEYw_vBdu4JJFqsk-Y/
3399576
2104145
Re: [Emailcore] AUTH only after STARTTLSRe: [Emailcore] AUTH only after STARTTLS
John C Klensin
2023-12-08
emailcore
None
/arch/msg/emailcore/RFgU1cYHr9RLRJkfDeZ9ttWZrhc/
3393382
2101043