Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/-qNDSWBuwD3LuT-iX89dM3w3ZBc/
220333
1075121
Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Alessandro Vesely
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/8bHdgTQuAfRSj_BDhB7n5aUzlzw/
220332
1075121
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Paul Russell
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/81zC92aY2GN7t-6DXD11aiCt8hE/
220331
1075114
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/jBYWFCdMJsCShQZ1Dk287HrsyME/
220330
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/zlIDyP1YtEtnkh-liJL3kvt2DcA/
220329
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/UQliv20AKL1t4R6dDV4vyo-skTY/
220328
1075112
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/EtCZsB2AOCoYB5DLx9MrNV35yYs/
220327
1075112
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/0BJMemnzh3kXGxKrGnCXARV1Wbo/
220326
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/lvMhkenXWF2q9j8ipfp8np9GbMs/
220325
1075114
Re: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't needRe: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't need
Alessandro Vesely
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/m88nDTU3PYqLsNEKtfTGgTcS9rI/
220324
1075121
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/hihfQamuAEs9XKvnD2zLJwNna_s/
220323
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/3GCGjBkAjMAwV3IGDqSxUXMKcmQ/
220322
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/ljABfE3PLKsQRA9EIsH4L-DHLu4/
220321
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/N-VyTCEKGfmLBVwKFIgSbbJ6h3A/
220320
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/kBbD5WLuIIgqRZ6rAG8a75BOWDE/
220319
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
Rich Kulawiec
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/sD41fcEdJlf3JSsizxy6A6gCUpI/
220318
1075121
Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/VsyfD_SjIjw4jECkxlmnTfywu90/
220317
1075121
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
Daniel Feenberg
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/N2S1Wpi61uN5hxXTAP38wkT0cjY/
220316
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/x8Od9c3pYn7BHALDgkJtRCxND14/
220315
1075121
Re: [Asrg] MX, was Adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] MX, was Adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/PMBHF7jhZTu3hCFY8iFyY1Kai6s/
220314
1075121
Re: [Asrg] who gets the report, was We really don't needRe: [Asrg] who gets the report, was We really don't need
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/HL8NgHUaxUEJFZFiPJfAKVfAVRU/
220313
1075121
Re: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't needRe: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't need
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/rwD4AZhN5ZtVXeI46y19r9pgnK4/
220312
1075121
Re: [Asrg] We really don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP foram button to MRe: [Asrg] We really don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP foram button to M
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/wJ608jnUpJ2KMgip98LFlT9btmM/
220311
1075121
Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
Bill Cole
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/s-ZgN5gTm9IIywUwupqTGRnH5oY/
220310
1075114
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
John R Levine
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/5Zl2t5wM7lCTeT6JRq3HbPvIPjM/
220309
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/DOS46I9JI78dpsAquA78d4coov8/
220308
1075114
Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?
Steve Atkins
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/34O-xUyb0ILbSqM66EYf1JLV_Yo/
220307
1075113
Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?
John Levine
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/sOh6mSeI1D3Qnl_KY7HZOzC7y58/
220306
1075113
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
John Levine
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/gunRC_DM0EsFiPT6s2Q7ubim2Mg/
220305
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
John Levine
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/s35AjfElEz-QFBBS5YwwI3-pkY8/
220304
1075112
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Chris Lewis
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/EezXOE2ey31yeqZsw35qdP48oew/
220303
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/JaTkIK1HsbZVJv82ZUq3L9aEg7Y/
220302
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/zeIeYk2_8CaUIsqw6gSqkYATsy0/
220301
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Martijn Grooten
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/Pdfxd3jT8sxDbKH_JnHg4i5ktgE/
220300
1075112
Re: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't needRe: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't need
Murray S. Kucherawy
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/8eMsLfqKfKwdxCoh7kgeXUXkqqc/
220299
1075121
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/2tYoqVaxqT357HGLca_5r4mPWt8/
220298
1075111
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Steve Atkins
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/zp48LXfejGfZOAl-P3TjIm9uWWY/
220297
1075112
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Seth
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/sRoJMu4fFwnUB-0nVpt_p5HxWUI/
220296
1075112
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/4Hi3ajgOpE8lb7ggOtHA_cDTqvM/
220295
1075111
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Chris Lewis
2010-02-08
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/WZjp_sgiZ2HbBoZvPsKsQhaIuYw/
220294
1075112
16061 Messages