Subject
From
Date
List
[Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1[Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Dan Brown
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/bXxSPHP3XNRY9ACxSSeHTZvNpU0/
2128019
1101200
Re: [Cfrg] [MASSMAIL] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1Re: [Cfrg] [MASSMAIL] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Grigory Marshalko
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/cKf-KSkcSYIbFW0nYOsw7xpGOK4/
2128578
1101200
Re: [Cfrg] [MASSMAIL] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1Re: [Cfrg] [MASSMAIL] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Grigory Marshalko
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Nlyau7sU_RyScvXd9hVztSTNURQ/
2128594
1101200
Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Dan Brown
2015-12-12
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/HMaYpWcTODhxJC9hSsI27lYtlfw/
2128776
1101200
Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Paterson, Kenny
2015-12-12
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/L7WREZyc4bT5dIKBbL4gGQUh9jQ/
2128792
1101200
Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Ben Laurie
2015-12-13
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/-CsWbuON8R_rkHQLHvfdbrNoHu4/
2128941
1101200
Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Dan Brown
2015-12-14
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/wLUt3MNdsek-owwx6hRuxztdCqs/
2128996
1101200
Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1Re: [Cfrg] Question about A=6 Montgomery over 2^89-1
Grigory Marshalko
2015-12-12
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/3BVVWpG9rszLv1-oQzpZx2QFroU/
2128791
1101200
[Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?[Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Stephen Farrell
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/7NwL6ASdF-YZK6thqBT6V42MoGU/
2127486
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Yoav Nir
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/9aPtoKOG92IS3WkWN2ndLJcRFoI/
2127586
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Stephen Farrell
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/BBB4Th6u_kZTtJICjJ0y2P3UQGc/
2127602
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Björn Edström
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/ITZ_uVFueoZNWP3ykPlkJNA8PWo/
2127644
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/tHUM6oVstDGwmxqbU0epFTqw110/
2127729
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Valery Smyslov
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/oLjuEe75f1MzUBLCOsBc-tm8e5s/
2127760
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Jim Schaad
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/2nhXJE2Zu18Q-JNPk17yRak6n6I/
2127950
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] [MASSMAIL] Re: would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] [MASSMAIL] Re: would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Григорий Маршалко
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Eoc4tFomtMbLQr0xKfifmpArgcw/
2128031
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Tom Ritter
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/nvcRnzbXp1j_iiN855NBQSfdZyU/
2128449
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
2015-12-12
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/V6L3AudCvmBu_cKncjrFlwzOGnQ/
2128821
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Nevil Brownlee
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/y1OYBPHDDgDKtaq9gZcG3K7Cw_U/
2128055
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Björn Edström
2015-12-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/D6HYZiePGWC5dzi-KkMyAHgXaC8/
2128073
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/WqkCBUsUkxFuuxfGHf67Fe4SByg/
2128151
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Björn Edström
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/IvrzK8Lf7xdgyVTAs9hPpKBafCs/
2128302
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Simon Josefsson
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/RRt2vlM42QBHq2SD_xKxdIeHo8c/
2128384
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Simon Josefsson
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/AqvJenybMJ_M_pZlhePLn7-Qgx0/
2128383
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Salz, Rich
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Vyu_UuGFtZ_jrJGp22s1T1WMgEE/
2128420
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Stephen Farrell
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/uIJmKKXRn3dr2waaYizYAnpyCA0/
2128424
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Salz, Rich
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/5EVRIEuCaz-jDMta2_qfAAaDXT0/
2128427
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Simon Josefsson
2015-12-13
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/QFYnME9L1jCKrv8eDemSBdqk5NE/
2128936
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Jy2K6xRpy80B5GTX9bD4atYAlFk/
2128474
1101201
Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?Re: [Cfrg] would it be a good idea for CFRG to try review algorithm documents?
Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
2015-12-12
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/EjOqfEbBswYRdTnDg5wwFUy_aUk/
2128816
1101201
[Cfrg] Fwd: code points for brainpool curves for DNSSEC[Cfrg] Fwd: code points for brainpool curves for DNSSEC
Stephen Farrell
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/6obgFU_yP_b8njFSksRj0WIu_k8/
2127305
1101202
[Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-01.txt[Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-01.txt
internet-drafts
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/9BdQfSEMdrBY59ZUOs97LDaI7vw/
2127074
1101203
[Cfrg] draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-01[Cfrg] draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-01
Simon Josefsson
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Q_CJIE1YeogiSntRQYsYddSP4YY/
2127081
1101203
[Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d[Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d
Björn Edström
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/XMIDtaf8_uiSiZjcFAlJUZrO6DI/
2127000
1101204
Re: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-dRe: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d
Bryan A Ford
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/yDK9-6z4rpaIIxXONbK1MYt0eLk/
2127083
1101204
[Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d[Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d
Björn Edström
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/GOPQ6lgJcfrXboexQmgNk_ZIZW8/
2127005
1101204
Re: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-dRe: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d
Simon Josefsson
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/pFYNvuvPAciFnu1sa9O24z5fuXc/
2127093
1101204
Re: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-dRe: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d
Ilari Liusvaara
2015-12-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Z_O4a9QePNAaNcMPrkoCN6e3V6I/
2127144
1101204
Re: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-dRe: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d
Gilles Van Assche
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/gn3EdXpRU9o8TrYBd46c0Ii6xV4/
2128389
1101204
Re: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-dRe: [Cfrg] On the differences of Ed25519/448 and how it affects a vote on twoshakes-d
Tony Arcieri
2015-12-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/v_bqSm0m-32WshHON7C_3jL7cs0/
2128614
1101204