[Cfrg] Integration of OPAQUE in IKEv2[Cfrg] Integration of OPAQUE in IKEv2
Hugo Krawczyk
2019-09-12
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/7NJgf6Pb3-l_nCEeVw1hexKQHHo/
2779475
1857583
[Cfrg] Review of the PAKE proposals[Cfrg] Review of the PAKE proposals
Yoav Nir
2019-09-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/PWhIOQKBHapZ1Rpbd7Brr_JFIg8/
2779380
1857583
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Kobi Gurkan
2019-09-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/YC1HIQLHo3m8wXyJuHzjiPplGc4/
2779132
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Björn Haase
2019-09-11
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/paYPSDXEV3OWv7sXhpt2ubXu2Pk/
2779081
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
2019-09-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/SvGoQNiJEF_t1_6tvQDgpLL1JQA/
2778879
1856789
[Cfrg] PAKE selection process - review how PAKEs fit to IKEv2[Cfrg] PAKE selection process - review how PAKEs fit to IKEv2
Valery Smyslov
2019-09-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/JP_BroADLdLYtjmky2u_h_DrVFM/
2778448
1857236
Re: [Cfrg] Isn't BSPAKE just a valid instantiaion of OPAQUE?Re: [Cfrg] Isn't BSPAKE just a valid instantiaion of OPAQUE?
Hugo Krawczyk
2019-09-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/o_BfhoKwYdqLMS3Kc-Um-VnpAmc/
2778391
1857194
Re: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrowRe: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrow
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2019-09-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/W6w_jGu6a9OsRpPHvit4yDCwQos/
2778355
1856143
[Cfrg] Isn't BSPAKE just a valid instantiaion of OPAQUE?[Cfrg] Isn't BSPAKE just a valid instantiaion of OPAQUE?
Bill Cox
2019-09-10
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/F_2ixQK2dVT_FrQbMBjopnz5FVE/
2778339
1857194
[Cfrg] My review of OPAQUE[Cfrg] My review of OPAQUE
Bill Cox
2019-09-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/-B16hIOerRsHgoIxiln05TiJ17o/
2782373
1858660
Re: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrowRe: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrow
Nico Williams
2019-09-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/dN3Ew4geDaB54mlLNAeMgJwDYVc/
2778128
1856143
Re: [Cfrg] Forward secrecy of SPAKE2Re: [Cfrg] Forward secrecy of SPAKE2
Wasa Bee
2019-09-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/5Kih1owg2jyfsrpiHbgXilQaN-c/
2778113
1856495
Re: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrowRe: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrow
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2019-09-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/oIyVO_I8VO2wWfdsfYvDKnga-ro/
2778057
1856143
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Riad S. Wahby
2019-09-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/w54mUSycF1zHAnwhY2knXawRDU4/
2777881
1856773
[Cfrg] Proof of SPAKE2 is sound?[Cfrg] Proof of SPAKE2 is sound?
Watson Ladd
2019-09-09
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/jBUSpq9xOOyOuwVUhd5E55_89TU/
2777852
1857012
Re: [Cfrg] OPAQUE at FacebookRe: [Cfrg] OPAQUE at Facebook
Bill Cox
2019-09-08
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/-fwH-yZA5_HT-PUZR1nCBZDL_v0/
2777832
1855528
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Watson Ladd
2019-09-08
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/vvkXvA6Rs3WYPZ_0EFbXWkiYvqk/
2777819
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Hao, Feng
2019-09-08
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/s28wVWribJ-OgyKm8WFT47ou_ho/
2777816
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Hao, Feng
2019-09-08
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/ZnSzuxmidCBrkMNRb65471lSPSU/
2777815
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Marek Jankowski
2019-09-08
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/FtsUkYhC3Chw_5888n0ZdMnnRhc/
2777790
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrowRe: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrow
Michael Richardson
2019-09-08
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/-QM2WLLZCeLRlYjdiiRzE-4lPas/
2777777
1856143
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Dan Harkins
2019-09-08
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/ZwbQdA8ZVdcoxFgJdV4Ngo76_ng/
2777834
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Jeff Burdges
2019-09-07
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/YnStBvGOqC9yuh7v0AW3ea6ZhIs/
2777680
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Chloe Martindale
2019-09-07
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/eAn3_8XpcG4R2VFhDtE_pomPo2Q/
2777655
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-07.txtRe: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-07.txt
Björn Haase
2019-09-07
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/hH6M3OJ13j9wIIqTcB84tAJUgqE/
2777638
1856940
[Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-07.txt[Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-07.txt
internet-drafts
2019-09-07
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/uFC7YihbDUbsqom4unN_sQEz8A4/
2777628
1856940
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/U_0EfDy8ycp8g5EcBv_V8WPRVWs/
2777466
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Hao, Feng
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/eEP2QeoAaUW7SAyv-HDJ_WE9b6o/
2777429
1856789
[Cfrg] [PAKE selection process] Revised version of the AuCPace / CPace security proofs available at iacr eprint[Cfrg] [PAKE selection process] Revised version of the AuCPace / CPace security proofs available at iacr eprint
Björn Haase
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/ZMXIdIRJyzSzlmgRauwCMGubhQA/
2777425
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Björn Haase
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/6aB70njGo2YLxXNUXgbob7yZQzA/
2777388
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Michael Scott
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/TXVBxWz_tYID44uHASsJGqGaK7M/
2777353
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Ff9kG4DR8m24ISd1hBW5QWzSUq0/
2777346
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Armando Faz
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/t7Mil1PqJ5P9nvwyBbxkubUEzbA/
2777342
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)Re: [Cfrg] My review of the four balanced PAKE (SPAKE2, SPEKE, CPACE, J-PAKE)
Watson Ladd
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Ckya68RYIQdpiJ47zH_htExMhds/
2777293
1856789
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Rene Struik
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/HcK5ZQpGByU7nwmfM7VmAq0FTP8/
2777176
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curvesRe: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Kobi Gurkan
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/gGT83U3BEXUZ56WrnDP5Ey8Nu_o/
2777155
1856773
[Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves[Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-yonezawa-pairing-friendly-curves
Paterson Kenneth
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/3WM51QmAbeQ5kElzDsFbJCXZzmU/
2777150
1856773
Re: [Cfrg] Trouble reproducing mulX_POLYVAL() test vector from RFC 8452 Appendix ARe: [Cfrg] Trouble reproducing mulX_POLYVAL() test vector from RFC 8452 Appendix A
Peter Gutmann
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/jpxABlu0883VSXlJUlzFJszPlJQ/
2777070
1856686
Re: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrowRe: [Cfrg] [Mathmesh] A different approach to key escrow
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2019-09-06
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/Vvg39QgvNqRgOJRXX_7RC3_g8Ac/
2777016
1856143
Re: [Cfrg] Trouble reproducing mulX_POLYVAL() test vector from RFC 8452 Appendix ARe: [Cfrg] Trouble reproducing mulX_POLYVAL() test vector from RFC 8452 Appendix A
Tony Arcieri
2019-09-05
cfrg
/arch/msg/cfrg/dMFUGrhPi4mxbKFwwZa30S_deO4/
2776911
1856686