Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Ian Levy
2019-12-06
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KImdBiQda2-c3Hh-D3K2b2LKoC0
2813774
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Brandon Long
2019-12-05
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/BnoGmbyFYn4gtbOG3u-Xo1idpM4
2813093
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/4fJwgCCBKPpbGoe8XVOy4gks2KE
2812870
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-12-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/KKQBLIJVWuGuYnfXpWhBRWyqDow
2812686
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Alessandro Vesely
2019-12-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/AGLpBXcxwJS7aUC0G46Q0cv99Qs
2812685
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Alessandro Vesely
2019-12-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nKfBzNlQv0aE3aNQPMg206EJj-o
2812684
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/DJ4m8b5A2at-r0FBkSOcX-ZXpHk
2812640
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Scott Kitterman
2019-12-04
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NxzZJ4DjxmY2bgK_xGlHHdPIM_w
2812638
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
John R Levine
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/aFy_4bu9t6tc6dl-XAYgx1HfptA
2812499
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Дилян Палаузов
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/TojQBG6Jax5SDb2r_ZTPoHRByag
2812498
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/epBXa4ZdOrcjFQWjKvwgV-HgcjY
2812488
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Seth Blank
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EN64puirNxCpcEU2uEQa1axdGfA
2812486
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hIJq5-EOwNh1V__7FXL-xWiFCv4
2812485
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/9ZtpT1pmS_Ey0flpBm26zL26EQs
2812483
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardizationRe: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/YMcqyrYt6fXJr4jIlvjBOh0aXFM
2812480
1840110
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/26vkfPNS7H7WZJtj50PBL-z6H_o
2812479
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for rfc8601 erratum (smtp.remote-ip), was Do is need a new ptype?
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EkAN-gAfy5fvBxyRyayhyc9_M7A
2812478
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Murray S. Kucherawy
2019-12-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wQmlt1x9ksyiQfYNLK7MCevj05g
2812467
1843355
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Dave Crocker
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Afyaz0YiJ9tzsINpehFzPjBbBCc
2811984
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
John C Klensin
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/GjjXiWXW_9up_88sVV9GuCLAceg
2811979
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/0zSX4eWn5xotC9ZrGVLKi3RRT6E
2811965
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
John C Klensin
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/33uQUlEcfbVv3vFNZNK7ffOAPS4
2811961
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Dave Crocker
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-KDgf1dxxxqcfP6iMAmOcpK8PkE
2811945
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-12-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mQZ-ZvkxGg6X2fyds8Z56Tbjvck
2811925
1869328
Re: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revisionRe: [dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Dave Crocker
2019-11-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1LRfgblj_lhbouY53tQEGftnUjk
2811534
1869328
[dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision[dmarc-ietf] From: rewriting, was Email standard revision
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-30
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/shRbxWIRsicAVRusLKFgRf2TAss
2811520
1869328
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
Дилян Палаузов
2019-11-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tEpuzwbRt__HHlVUXo41fHq5XoU
2806887
1840110
[dmarc-ietf] Purpose of aggregate reports / Re:Two new fields in aggregate reports[dmarc-ietf] Purpose of aggregate reports / Re:Two new fields in aggregate reports
Дилян Палаузов
2019-11-18
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/uPWe67-hN6oW4t98J6TXkLOqmYM
2806885
1863160
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Ian Levy
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SoJM8gNulOXGc0uZ_Aw1gZIiBBY
2804298
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/sQ80VwDRO2LPMODwFhaPr1XNt6k
2804226
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Ian Levy
2019-11-12
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1gi1TNCtkn5c_n6utvJZJuVXqDk
2804201
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/CUZNKqa6sWULxaF73lqlJCcSsL8
2804036
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-hxSR_ARN587TMo56CQ27EK9p8E
2804034
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
John Levine
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wJmyLe-W0yuLyvLc_xr_QtdB4hw
2804028
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Dave Crocker
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/86idA5YAJcKKwhTU4vKRk9aAzw0
2804026
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Dave Crocker
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MJq9eO3Jh-VQIEt7I0bZ5eGF1GY
2804023
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-jF0f8GFZipgJFoPDKSG7ppiIz0
2804009
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Tim Wicinski
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/_Q4pEZR18Vz5wTVT7t8JO6FuP1Y
2804004
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psdRe: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
Alessandro Vesely
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/B61OxDSzyYHorZvq6FDrAxlfin0
2803976
1853845
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWLRe: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
Scott Kitterman
2019-11-11
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dFBS2_BVkBLQrN_9OGmAArBSlM0
2803966
1843355