Subject
From
Date
List
[dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM[dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Terry Zink
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/-SUOVqAa4ipOC24f3Fi968SV5us/
355170
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Dave Crocker
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZKYjoCnbULKHD-Y9ovdJJL4cEOY/
355171
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Zq74tbNkXuyI_zyzmMbg6tq-YZQ/
355174
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Terry Zink
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IbDpfXTv36mJagnCxETCjZc46eE/
355182
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wazwe0oh67xvauRneuwUNifj6Ek/
355186
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/f4bQYDGmkiG61NyD1ey7E-s4bbg/
355192
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Terry Zink
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/02Fe00MunsCyhLo3IAAQmL3drT4/
355193
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/d9fI5s188UjePUxaC1nN-5pvovg/
355198
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
J. Gomez
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/ftX7EJ1DD_bUYoIYhYZdoIR9SXo/
355199
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Scott Kitterman
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SL5yZ1Xd14ycT7fvVWwraTMBTAQ/
355200
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/cR92pD6qC1NZvrjBUX-4daml5jY/
355204
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Murray S. Kucherawy
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/tArYQ6q7fXdqcMlYcNZ_eXAYOLM/
355207
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Terry Zink
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/fNNa5txMtsIWdHi_l9t7YG0YVtU/
355209
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Tim Draegen
2013-04-03
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/g0WJrk3tcBB5q8XA2Ujenbx6iJ4/
355212
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/EuHh5-pt5LvJ8_Y84kAH0e79SEw/
355175
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Terry Zink
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/1ULKGSGdQeYHUSAUihl3ep_ZwsA/
355180
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Franck Martin
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/v389gm4bSk5pGDz1tJC94cEmy7U/
355181
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/OiruLQ4XTzjzQ2-mN0WqAyZoaC4/
355184
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Terry Zink
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/NRAs50MiwLJLtPBH0bKoTsVDyqo/
355188
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dZ7CuuQVrlVnJ8M9uF4Y7pOjitA/
355194
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
J. Gomez
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QhsPiGXY-xdIRxgJWyeOL8A2HZI/
355196
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
J. Gomez
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/UcHXIlrhKVVdBPeTjYuUaOXv5Ik/
355185
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/e9M9-glzCqWeB84Zq-FF7O47dp8/
355187
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Scott Kitterman
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/veUgqmTJ9UOvdDn_ZdUkxCBswI0/
355190
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Elizabeth Zwicky
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/SpVvfhV_IZGJMFFilMCp3w628TY/
355211
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/zeKJydik7E6ehyEli1ddVyqvPbQ/
355183
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
J. Gomez
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QioMx2IckhvtntCVQoUBRwWEQEc/
355191
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/IF62xxZSsJXnwnYpFWSdXvZ6iKc/
355195
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
J. Gomez
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/mPgY8anTLPpGEz2zrDPxO7Exj6M/
355197
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
John Levine
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/lyMQz8-jWKnntBqMa0I8siMzfM8/
355173
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally requireSPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally requireSPF and DKIM
J. Gomez
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/wM9pVVJArEf6IRs0bLI8K5iOI_4/
355176
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally requireSPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally requireSPF and DKIM
Franck Martin
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/7l6ADN864-Hvb8uYTR-lc4I0dic/
355177
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
J. Gomez
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/dt4UpK4ZHkLRTuHQUjMJPv8MmJg/
355178
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Franck Martin
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/hXMywT85rgWoevsT5-Anx5ckZ0M/
355179
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally require SPF and DKIM
Scott Kitterman
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/5-GsC9SRZbYyK8OGFnk3S_ShUaA/
355189
1125874
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally requireSPF and DKIMRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposing an extension to DMARC to optionally requireSPF and DKIM
Elizabeth Zwicky
2013-04-02
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/Efs4M1JtdvJZC7pyXHwXcVZacgg/
355210
1125874
[dmarc-ietf] Missing part in section 7.1[dmarc-ietf] Missing part in section 7.1
J. Gomez
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/n21yILWROkKSTY-Da4xYN0-AgoU/
355169
1125875
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Missing part in section 7.1Re: [dmarc-ietf] Missing part in section 7.1
Murray S. Kucherawy
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/nIWIHQgvLXYCQtwgmwqVWmP4Qss/
355172
1125875
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-dmarc-bcp-01.txt[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-dmarc-bcp-01.txt
Dave Crocker
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/QmEVpKUvWQ144ljrGTgnIHLCdPY/
355167
1125876
[dmarc-ietf] Changes in draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base[dmarc-ietf] Changes in draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base
Scott Kitterman
2013-04-01
dmarc
/arch/msg/dmarc/MHXjDJWtwxvHsqpqV9IrTQWYbt4/
355165
1125877