[dmarc-ietf] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-38: (with COMMENT)[dmarc-ietf] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-38: (with COMMENT)
Todd Herr
2025-02-07
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/gxiwGZ5UMe5ulRgMDZM9iAWKPBU/
3557722
2173292
[dmarc-ietf] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-38: (with COMMENT)[dmarc-ietf] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-38: (with COMMENT)
John R. Levine
2025-02-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fzWb1t7EiDCd6yog7owtaeFDLpQ/
3557433
2173292
[dmarc-ietf] Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-38: (with COMMENT)[dmarc-ietf] Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-38: (with COMMENT)
Orie Steele via Datatracker
2025-02-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/7I3KEGtNMMHZc2qQDOWngRdcdns/
3557405
2173292
[dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36.txt> (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)) to Proposed Standard[dmarc-ietf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36.txt> (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)) to Proposed Standard
The IESG
2024-11-20
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/OHPKax98gmtSkgoJfPXMXpXB3ZY/
3531697
2162536
[dmarc-ietf] Re: Discussion Thread for Issue 155[dmarc-ietf] Re: Discussion Thread for Issue 155
John R Levine
2024-10-25
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/oqUomdooLU1_oCOnyYiU7pW1WQ4/
3520986
2157734
[dmarc-ietf] Re: DMARCbis version -33 is ready for document shepherd and AD processing[dmarc-ietf] Re: DMARCbis version -33 is ready for document shepherd and AD processing
Alessandro Vesely
2024-09-16
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/-ufXmqQ8RQlRFn2wrZPZrZkZtAk/
3505291
2146932
[dmarc-ietf] Re: DMARCbis version -33 is ready for document shepherd and AD processing[dmarc-ietf] Re: DMARCbis version -33 is ready for document shepherd and AD processing
Todd Herr
2024-09-16
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ED0bOMaeG-BADXOuvRB1YaFph-M/
3505194
2146932
[dmarc-ietf] Re: DMARCbis version -33 is ready for document shepherd and AD processing[dmarc-ietf] Re: DMARCbis version -33 is ready for document shepherd and AD processing
Todd Herr
2024-09-09
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/tdEeuPAR-A0vkRi07ZpJsougbi8/
3502444
2146932
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARCRe: [dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARC
Alessandro Vesely
2024-04-04
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/6Dnzjo52QFy3HvHAaahALSUVv3Y/
3445723
2127140
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement ConsiderationsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement Considerations
Barry Leiba
2023-09-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/yyD1-IraPCU7CUL3f8xB53T3ckY/
3357524
2085398
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement ConsiderationsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement Considerations
Dotzero
2023-09-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/CNPcKUXhtOrFfSb6h_UNMqoswiI/
3357476
2085398
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement ConsiderationsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement Considerations
Scott Kitterman
2023-09-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ASrONfOwueroakCC6d9GIfEPG2E/
3357455
2085398
[dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement Considerations[dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement Considerations
Alessandro Vesely
2023-09-19
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/aiDJorciXfCv3PGsO9vo2jGCjTg/
3357397
2085398
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Wei Chuang
2023-07-15
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/fwB8WYLyvktgZHVZzufwb_kfNvA/
3330291
2072207
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Jim Fenton
2023-07-09
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/9Rx08F4CGW5iydlox7rqA1Gkc_M/
3326863
2072207
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Scott Kitterman
2023-07-07
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/hgW7P5jcEl12b2MScnBu0AJ90Q0/
3325986
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Barry Leiba
2023-07-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/QA_DHQinHsOrG9qqw8TKj9FNjpw/
3325800
2072207
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Brotman, Alex
2023-07-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/WJEh9bIhgcEQw8ukcbPsawKN32k/
3325796
2072207
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Barry Leiba
2023-07-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/VJQBHyQS86QofP4qzmjzlgg7va4/
3325654
2072207
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Alessandro Vesely
2023-07-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/AgkiIvZDrVq7Ui-bfIRvuD_meUA/
3325648
2072207
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposalRe: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Douglas Foster
2023-07-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/gwYXSMZ5EeaWwaZegQIjtfa6et8/
3325636
2072207
[dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal[dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal
Barry Leiba
2023-07-06
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/k6zxrKDepif26uWr0DeNdCK1xx4/
3325610
2072207
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Douglas Foster
2023-04-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/yuGT25LZC5xa3JamGqoutG0ARIE/
3305262
2058711
[dmarc-ietf] Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows[dmarc-ietf] Summary: Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-29
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ZGZrr-Vwa9skF_-rGVGMqbQdEFU/
3305223
2058711
[dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows[dmarc-ietf] Search for some consensus, was: Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-25
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/wvuuggXnpT-8sMU49q3Xn9_BjHs/
3303472
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=rejectRe: [dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=reject
Mark Alley
2023-04-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/t7Vaz6eP9TDyVnZBGel_JYgOTUc/
3299701
2059017
[dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=reject[dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=reject
Matthäus Wander
2023-04-14
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/lZU5BOqzWgu44yQePJ2lxjpK6e4/
3299673
2059017
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Barry Leiba
2023-04-13
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ezCLrjwL_POlm7Tz9FyGQY86OV0/
3299328
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Todd Herr
2023-04-13
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/JVUdGoqJMXkPnaZuytzzNZ4bho4/
3299310
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Douglas Foster
2023-04-13
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/WSBkMlp2IGztB7pcSDM8SMWtJTQ/
3299172
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Murray S. Kucherawy
2023-04-13
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/KQNVG2u5PFPpFKzEID3YsVyApv4/
3299016
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs
Todd Herr
2023-04-12
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/KN9vUvMTKJvhbo2J41jvahPWdiI/
3298852
2060922
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/7SaY6ODVMqVtrqDtVDztuGHPTZA/
3297387
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Douglas Foster
2023-04-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/Th6WQuT5zcPcbQME5ezyv2M5PJI/
3297381
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Mark Alley
2023-04-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/yzSfMY5XBvZgqsXUysvIoZMZHBs/
3297379
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/ozsW80yCkYy67mddw3Wsi32hkdQ/
3297378
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Dotzero
2023-04-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/z8qTWyGdXDyiGrClD1eL_z2iCJ0/
3297373
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flowsRe: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows
Scott Kitterman
2023-04-08
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/tFdI27KEN7sVX_MHv7YNq05DRsk/
3297371
2058711
Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specificationRe: [dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specification
Scott Kitterman
2023-03-31
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/1Uv15gEkMks5D3yEcXv8J-j8vuI/
3294990
2059382
Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specificationRe: [dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specification
Todd Herr
2023-03-31
dmarc
None
/arch/msg/dmarc/rFJvzWSrtRZf4cJO9gg9rlhsOsI/
3294982
2059382