Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/WdP50CC_QtkWIkV8Tmd9CpnMar8/
2821428
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/jrauNSJoJPGbVp_DoBAXRf2k7UI/
2821366
1872373
[ietf-smtp] lounging around[ietf-smtp] lounging around
Dave Crocker
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Q2WFdb-njK7cmC5JSwLIdsTkTqU/
2821361
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/oziQ64An0PTqu2UitWMq3fzpWcI/
2821360
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Dave Crocker
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Hx3CtBmpF1VEd25wooTVVOsgi2c/
2821356
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Ned Freed
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/v8hQ-M_4ReS6Q5xvsNxfXIagc4w/
2821354
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/MaOmXZut2nvKroM_MvLhDX7v7Fs/
2821351
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Ned Freed
2020-01-03
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/_dc7WFI2WBFiMdtcCec78AIKEbU/
2821349
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/qAKtDqNJyaG8WEL90UOReSPs9VM/
2821302
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
John Levine
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/-DAezuwkp5nbr-a648CKFotqP5E/
2821277
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
John Levine
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/khgVXlJZ94RcEoO3zeSWqWEMcDg/
2821268
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZqHfjSGLzaiypo7ZPjkXM2mC8IA/
2821263
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
John C Klensin
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZYhXV3RCEQiglOcWkiubZi0U6k0/
2821260
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/dmX1OLk7kaDQPzfjhkc8JDurNA4/
2821249
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/xaicB-8qBo10TSYEAgBCLge31fM/
2821228
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Ooa_4XYNA4G0iPnrY5KXlrtisHo/
2821222
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/3891M-xmKC8XOTGgyahG4-nK7k0/
2821221
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Kb23Ntk-FgnkviYXMEqdjvAec3w/
2821207
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/A7kx_UNO6_j5Rc0MxNwBMYsCsKs/
2821204
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/oLXxNr_TL-etaZUHBLAUsEcAJww/
2821203
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Jg-L4yBIVZyTwLEIWdQeE0Kv34g/
2821201
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/eH-i4APbOCd0BbGYWmDsXh72yQw/
2821198
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Arnt Gulbrandsen
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hsIrKCqPFRpGRKpRHw5W7v6lLLQ/
2821197
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/LPSGkCAHIhp8G5QPIF5nSoO_Dgs/
2821196
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/FuxC-6Jak8ivH-Pf8Ecpj6zRdws/
2821194
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/wABe_iWtG_uFafgTCk-QguyMs0k/
2821188
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/88FXo2aNIlySqJDcEovvF_f0MVg/
2821176
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
John C Klensin
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/XCzgAp6Ny0m4PWQcFt3boayUB5E/
2821173
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/CVI5XX1mvAV_ABE_VYjaJPJEtGQ/
2821167
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/QRKePVJ-9YdFrr8uAZeP94mNTww/
2821166
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/N45mdZkPHXdEhd3FwNGf8CS1XbQ/
2821161
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/mEQLq5DfmpH3Vg6LXbmtvnTaM_w/
2821156
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Keith Moore
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/AQ8raPof13w7ZhdHbHpobBI5aMc/
2821154
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
John R Levine
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/y6TOIBVk_WCUdGw7P9QKhMSqO6c/
2821149
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/GgAcIn_Ik8pIaLW-dN7eFK2omw4/
2821143
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/KK0GtDVFNRp5hnZpvel0tOwIGZY/
2821129
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Dave Crocker
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Vx-gU8c4yaVrW2eWTvDn32acqRc/
2821118
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/VTmQJ80XcnCFI7ieuW2w0c_649M/
2821117
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTPRe: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Hector Santos
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/zsx61SIpbh9gXlKDZq-uyWi9YI4/
2821102
1872373
Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literalsRe: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
Alessandro Vesely
2020-01-02
ietf-smtp
/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/d7iI6H0sUpiG-Kkx6rs4lhhrdaw/
2821075
1872373