Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 02 January 2020 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA91B120112 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:03:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=d9pRuKKx; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=nXW4XgJZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ztOJGFGt3Fy for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:03:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0625F1200FB for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:03:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 89212 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2020 17:03:09 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=15c7a.5e0e224d.k2001; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=SWP1WF60M9rLItO7maLzRf/gkbLNh/dfaqGo4K7qEL0=; b=d9pRuKKxxdpgQwkpGy87Oc3Y6BKuSpHwrWA2hNKIC3iEwgGETaimRx3YwiNTXFZyCE84P/Jf6fGrHCbk1JkJF4eZHaeD7pZbYqbgl/aDujscsR/Sg29Hi/QFYN/4Ul5SNl42y173Ou/PkzpwMRJSiyy5QFMhq3U15nJdXLR4OMu0lvx7Yll7bc0p0/TkY3oWSJVgbB3YV0Oosc1eew8DOpwRiHAPRAmkL80yem0QyMtwH2S4ewYZN1fez/C7vjJV
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=15c7a.5e0e224d.k2001; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=SWP1WF60M9rLItO7maLzRf/gkbLNh/dfaqGo4K7qEL0=; b=nXW4XgJZIdW4gmFsb6PKyxcL/L+HwS7DppUiT8k5+xOQRfTNawIhb9swCs7A/2e3XTBOXtcehshKJf+v5dggoMwolbZ095JOc6ta38Cvokta8zi/I11ZVs4DvYLADPJsEwOmxjkU5P3bFnf8fdWoF6N0MLb9LUn/SWe4Hl4ANeC02wQExBSzpMoJn3+vp52wY7P03rtBWSocCSEaed/bu1mGXJ83bRNqK1TFHCYdcMHQvN2YZ/dGTXi0XzOFaL/k
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 02 Jan 2020 17:03:09 -0000
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 12:03:09 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.99999.374.2001021202330.56444@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <c3fcf56a-e9b9-e979-16b0-cbec677dd2f2@dcrocker.net>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.2001011101090.45428@gal.iecc.com> <f0f15437-8315-8e5e-e402-c3e8b0688261@dcrocker.net> <25cabd85-681c-28d4-64e3-97f1ec170911@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.99999.374.2001011126340.52164@ary.qy> <c3fcf56a-e9b9-e979-16b0-cbec677dd2f2@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.99999 (OSX 374 2019-10-27)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/y6TOIBVk_WCUdGw7P9QKhMSqO6c>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:03:13 -0000

On Thu, 2 Jan 2020, Dave Crocker wrote:
> The current RFC has material that made sense to include in 1982. It arguably 
> should have been removed from RFC 2821, but in any event is clearly out of 
> scope now and that material is substantially out of step.

Agreed.  I do think there's a few things like STARTTLS that need to move 
into the mandatory core, but not many.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly