IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 27 December 2019 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07FD120018 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:13:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rb8yK2VOBECa for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:13:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6387120806 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [192.168.1.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4918299E05 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:13:04 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <553FE6792AFBD83DA7DFE7F0@PSB>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:13:04 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <2BB1805D-05F3-47B6-9897-45C4AE05EB08@dukhovni.org>
References: <FCDE38AEA7DDB9BB0FB206F9@PSB> <0605ee67-86eb-3e27-26b0-7a1c16a37bee@tana.it> <553FE6792AFBD83DA7DFE7F0@PSB>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/_oJk2lAo3okgqbzF9-LhNzK3ua0>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 18:13:09 -0000

> On Dec 27, 2019, at 12:07 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> Ok, I have revised the working draft to include additional
> issues suggested by on and off-list notes.  Several of those
> identified issues already called out in -02 either by the errata
> or by the inline CREF notes.

It seems that the -02 has not yet been uploaded, did you mean for it
to be already available?

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email