Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
Laura Atkins <laura@wordtothewise.com> Mon, 30 December 2019 16:34 UTC
Return-Path: <laura@wordtothewise.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364A1120A9D for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:34:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wordtothewise.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sdBWaQKBGw3d for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.wordtothewise.com (mail.wordtothewise.com [104.225.223.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8052A120A9A for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.227] (unknown [37.228.252.243]) by mail.wordtothewise.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 541D59F147 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 08:34:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wordtothewise.com; s=aardvark; t=1577723668; bh=OPxYd0mRhSkJBXBT2oSnSIvvmB5AiqbyQ939FhO4qsg=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From; b=hJKrxwOy6E9Gmz6Ha0LCjbzn2b0i/srg0bCMxyZRHaqJFFCwMT5O+qjJZbf02IFjz +9IMHxQXl+eG5myNfP/oIV3mTbmAufxspceyZSwYolacYnjIqCzUyQ6sSwThfTYp+R YfQ5w0CMjjuvdoJrR5PEOx6qoCrZWOl9jJzt0hPU=
From: Laura Atkins <laura@wordtothewise.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8D3979BB-D23C-44FB-B2FD-D55CEF61E236"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:34:25 +0000
References: <20191230013034.2C3E111D376E@ary.qy> <f894c448-ac91-6d27-98d6-0803de4ea535@network-heretics.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.99999.374.1912292129450.44159@ary.qy> <d3dc48b0-332b-c2fe-704a-d6dc69eb5424@network-heretics.com> <3883B58F-1307-4883-BDB8-9CCAFC0E363C@wordtothewise.com> <f091d5f8-7b5c-ce09-c846-59a81a70f44b@network-heretics.com> <A60E477B-A3CA-4463-B011-F6C1A08AD70C@wordtothewise.com> <cf63ad58-2cd7-7827-bf4c-f56179757dd5@network-heretics.com>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <cf63ad58-2cd7-7827-bf4c-f56179757dd5@network-heretics.com>
Message-Id: <C7DAB0D4-AC4D-4ACA-865B-FD74AA659438@wordtothewise.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/myUUGBBF4VmJQ6gLuuG9yMxoSME>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:34:31 -0000
> On 30 Dec 2019, at 16:06, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote: > > On 12/30/19 10:58 AM, Laura Atkins wrote: >> >>> On 30 Dec 2019, at 15:24, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com <mailto:moore@network-heretics.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/30/19 8:31 AM, Laura Atkins wrote: >>> >>>> 30% of email addresses on a marketing list go bad every year. It doesn’t seem that changing email addresses is that problematic. >>> >>> Of course it is problematic, because any email address that is changed for that reason cannot be used as stable contact info for use between friends and colleagues. And this degrades the utility of email. >> >> This has been the case since 1999. > So addressing the issue is clearly long overdue. Why are you assuming no one has attempted to address the issue in 20 years? > >>> Of those 30%, I wonder how many of those addresses were addresses that people intended to use as stable addresses in the first place. I wonder how many people obtain "throwaway" addresses specifically for the purpose of disclosing in contexts where they seem likely to be exploited by marketers, while reserving other addresses for use for mail that they want to get. >> >> There has been published research on this. Which goes back to what Dave was saying - you really need to understand what has been done before you start proposing solutions. I have a copy of the ..pdf, but you can search google to find it, too. The title is "ISPs and Spam: The Impact of Spam on Customer Retention and Acquisition," Gartner Inc., Stamford, Conn. June 14, 1999. > Thanks for this and other references. I certainly agree that I need to survey the literature. But it's not necessary to survey the literature to understand that spam is a huge problem and that existing solutions are inadequate. > It is necessary to understand why the existing solutions are what they are. You’ve made a host of assumptions that are, quite honestly, disrespectful of the people who’ve been working on this for their entire careers. > (I assume this is your reference for the 30% figure also?) > This is, to the best of my research, the original iteration of the 30% figure. There is more recent data as well. >>> But yes, I'm aware that one of the ways that people deal with spam is by changing email addresses. If spam as experienced by ordinary people were not so bad, causing them to change email addresses as a way of dealing with it, email would be more useful. >> >> In 1999, the volume of spam was a tiny fraction of what it is today. And, yet, it was bad enough to cause 30% of people to abandon their email addresses. > And yet, a lot has changed since 1999, so the conditions that caused 30% of the people to abandon email addresses then may not be the same conditions that exist now, even if that 30% figure were about the same today as then. (but do we even know that?) > This is the type of question you can answer yourself with research. laura -- Having an Email Crisis? We can help! 800 823-9674 Laura Atkins Word to the Wise laura@wordtothewise.com (650) 437-0741 Email Delivery Blog: https://wordtothewise.com/blog
- [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forwa… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contiibution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Laura Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Laura Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Laura Atkins
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- [ietf-smtp] It's not about IP-Literals, its about… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] SMTP client certs John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Richard Clayton
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… John C Klensin
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible contribution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Ned Freed
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- [ietf-smtp] lounging around Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on IP literals John R Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving f… Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] Endless debate on submission auth… John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around John Levine
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around Keith Moore
- Re: [ietf-smtp] lounging around Dave Crocker