IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Thu, 26 December 2019 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE6A1200F5 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:59:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LxXE_OFagva for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E93A4120025 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:59:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.200.2.180] (sdzac10-108-1-nat.nje.twosigma.com [8.2.105.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E69DE298EC6 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:59:04 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <64DEBBA8-FEBC-499B-80A0-EF49A2210BB2@dukhovni.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:59:04 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <C8C800EE-4CAA-48E4-AF22-21C80999C74E@dukhovni.org>
References: <FCDE38AEA7DDB9BB0FB206F9@PSB> <0cbf23be-dbfc-f78f-8e63-d92d6e34fbf0@network-heretics.com> <37C195CAA3295DE832711B38@PSB> <434a885c-3709-b90b-40cd-4c45ba339666@network-heretics.com> <64DEBBA8-FEBC-499B-80A0-EF49A2210BB2@dukhovni.org>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/nv2FpCgTad75CvauB7-io-YIxcg>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 22:59:07 -0000

> On Dec 26, 2019, at 5:37 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> 
> It may well be too soon to *mandate* TLS, but we could perhaps MUST a
> RECOMMENDED or a SHOULD for inter-domain relay of email.

I botched that sentence, the "MUST" was not supposed to be there.

	... we could perhaps agree on ...

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email