IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 30 December 2019 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E991200E5 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:31:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=InxHvDGH; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=k9NqsFsP
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfCAH-BXWTdn for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6DA12006F for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:31:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 19341 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2019 02:31:01 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=4b8b.5e096165.k1912; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=kUXBJH4Us7c1RhhlLyJ7ZdVFQQRQhMKPzSZVVXD14lE=; b=InxHvDGHN/k0/WHCzMaleASnQ74+vVxb/MtdugCCXz4hjf5rTYGleeP2Y+FqjTF6zQCd8Cc0EyoqG94HAn3OoKMnoTXENfd6frP8qukqS/e8/fGN/wghxmyxSWHYPsxOS4lN3b8mXYRNhSlipi1rk1KS9FVUzxMUj/RBFMgDaxvhm/djGH6MVJzAX0144a2KPdBMrqaALyO6+eYE+AQ2G2GFPXvVXpyrAV4enjNioFn3sTaKm/Nv5AH35AIv8g6y
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=4b8b.5e096165.k1912; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=kUXBJH4Us7c1RhhlLyJ7ZdVFQQRQhMKPzSZVVXD14lE=; b=k9NqsFsPr9W+0BQny7RJmGoq9yC7uonhBHWnOMDzGZkfGRfOJlqIwaZpUNNpOqSqgdlZVPEVV32VfPpwKN5yCScJUplqLobvpvyH6RKKWmeD7VkCY+QmuBasfPKRLuG/W0QDuNoQOLmPFCfGRGKn5Vyt/+u+7aT0ZJ7uBFSvyBYyITitSqADWggIVJ1JmXrY/cdIkvd5i9t9tlNIZ8w6N73Wo8w645g8PNGI0RMttIyuyGCK4nlWWgU6e5fFma/s
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 30 Dec 2019 02:31:01 -0000
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:31:01 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.99999.374.1912292129450.44159@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <f894c448-ac91-6d27-98d6-0803de4ea535@network-heretics.com>
References: <20191230013034.2C3E111D376E@ary.qy> <f894c448-ac91-6d27-98d6-0803de4ea535@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.99999 (OSX 374 2019-10-27)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1392367848-1577673061=:44159"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/BoAB3-_7xIR7PTXOzubM-KWDKq8>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Possible cont4ibution to moving forward with RFC5321bis SMTP
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:31:05 -0000

> So they're not subject to outside scrutiny.  No wonder email delivery is so 
> unreliable.

Aw, come on.  They have a billion users who vote with their feet if 
they're unhappy.

Nothing personal but I cannot imagine why someone running a large mail 
system would care what you or I thought of their filtering scheme.  They 
have way more data than we will ever have.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email