Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_xxepjExGP9MpMzPo_L1vn67SfM/
2696934
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/CPsGKCzffVG0H4sF5ENZcaSr5B4/
2696932
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/5gWDd9RLUUOzIFTApyPnqMuAoEM/
2696918
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/EwIJxq8BKwHcrw_-2ro9oYtnsp8/
2696915
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LUiRF9dZirUnA4JnLtRRHN12_WU/
2696913
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/RBCYfUS8gGXw7WNY0wGMXskvOd8/
2696911
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/1DdmhJwM3farW-2f7DFxFAn8HdQ/
2696909
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Brian E Carpenter
2019-02-23
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/AVcPM5aTtnWx0rY0JDscIsF2I0w/
2696797
1825007
Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/HEZ6GOYW8ljasjV1rH8oF9q3i80/
2696751
1825007
Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/HoFrYnuwVp_MPh5EdiH3aohzuZc/
2696745
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Owen DeLong
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aCfWF8HnwwmwrrxCw12O9AmNz70/
2696740
1825007
Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/-FCC-LCW1HacrlCghPeQNGxmPxw/
2696730
1825007
Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)
David Farmer
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Kjn9sAT8SmjfaI2x6MEVTdfbORY/
2696726
1825007
Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Michael Richardson
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/2rdGB0eHLe9yPiDq6ceX0aHOhFQ/
2696723
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/al0OkmmIMSI7v80XaPEzeLhmPg8/
2696708
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Rwvdd5tjfObQwRSzGhvDj9DXAjA/
2696703
1825007
Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/pGCH_g8DlBUE1g0JvFFmcIFBr8c/
2696680
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/0vkHPzmvdhuxUJ6aOEH3-8ThxW8/
2696672
1825007
Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/4EC5T99eBOWQZ3kFp11Ro602o0o/
2696668
1825007
Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/phClZOjOrCGgo2zAwJCYUf6u5OU/
2696659
1825007
Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)
David Farmer
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/S1jGtCDaz6MnOMnD2XVGoegHQlE/
2696649
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Timothy Winters
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/JoPHGD5H-zeNM5B-eKmorylMQVY/
2696647
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Tim Chown
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/osv61S8osJni8pwhPcwq_YTxUNY/
2696641
1825007
Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/i3vpGOgThsdUeAkUhL0AMZ_aaDk/
2696630
1825007
Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)Re: Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)
Michael Richardson
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/xxTKgRel1s4LtqerloFLwOZszY4/
2696624
1825007
Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)Re: [v6ops] Stability and Resilience (was Re: A common...)
Owen DeLong
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_LYj6cor6IcR4p46un-Jj8Y2yGA/
2696621
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Christian Huitema
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/TvzR87M2M4E5ynN1K7f2R1ciX18/
2696612
1825007
Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)Stability and Resilience (was Re: [v6ops] A common...)
Lee Howard
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/-GRD3vutEKlpao61odl7nq5KE5k/
2696598
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Nick Hilliard
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/-8hqmZDpyTPQtyncIirZ98uskdU/
2696499
1825007
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Mark Smith
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/gwRyJe95OuzFu6L6a3pNg6YT0OY/
2696417
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Christian Huitema
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/vROVkK-Gx9aj6ASrK2PddnAXVrk/
2696413
1825007
Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Is addressing privacy via NAT really achieving much compared to a privacy goal of anonymity? (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Mark Smith
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/93mjucsm4WnQTslbYbiWOYxYGfw/
2696409
1825007
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Kristian McColm
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/81lrzNIMEVgRAcxVATY5ulFLlIA/
2696384
1825007
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Raymond Burkholder
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/C1oJAUmBftHdSpC5UHmPDj0FgvQ/
2696373
1825007
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Ca By
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/uoW4zvtAr_VG6BoXQ2vxmgHpcXw/
2696345
1825007
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Kristian McColm
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/SRxOIJo2nuGexMd49paAN4A7qag/
2696337
1825007
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/bW2UfsnJVVVxw8ebUhTTNuFO-GU/
2696326
1825007
Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: [v6ops] NAT debate (Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Kristian McColm
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_dLE0KwFKO4cXBDTub8Py-XbDaU/
2696315
1825007
Re: NAT debate (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)Re: NAT debate (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Tom Herbert
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ogGqyZSRR_m0y8XlBJFbTw_igFM/
2696310
1825007
NAT debate (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)NAT debate (Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios)
Fernando Gont
2019-02-22
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/uR3BhM0OIO_iEFowxPVHb8vVVVo/
2696303
1825007