Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/L6PZ-QyVjhKS--QSlx93Md_OMRA/
2617441
1797929
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve ACK_ECN frame encoding (e.g., use bit-vector) (#1439)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Improve ACK_ECN frame encoding (e.g., use bit-vector) (#1439)
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lryW8AEXXOqwbPZ8ziI3_ONxm8k/
2617440
1789349
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An endpoint cannot renege on advertised limits (#1622)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] An endpoint cannot renege on advertised limits (#1622)
Marten Seemann
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aKcgs3TB9tVTkNfmsrn-0qKWokU/
2617436
1798799
[quicwg/base-drafts] Fix dangling references (#1623)[quicwg/base-drafts] Fix dangling references (#1623)
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ivpZXp72yG3jYTAKaKNsskx8os4/
2617435
1798802
[quicwg/base-drafts] 2bff0a: An endpoint cannot renege on advertised limits[quicwg/base-drafts] 2bff0a: An endpoint cannot renege on advertised limits
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/s4aZzunSCGpVJZ6GtkyJqx-U0gM/
2617434
1798801
[quicwg/base-drafts] 83c397: Fix broken references from transport draft, fixes ...[quicwg/base-drafts] 83c397: Fix broken references from transport draft, fixes ...
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gBxYVjc9Ic7UgVyOgYZc2J3nLa4/
2617433
1798800
[quicwg/base-drafts] An endpoint cannot renege on advertised limits (#1622)[quicwg/base-drafts] An endpoint cannot renege on advertised limits (#1622)
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bSsGabIdtp15rdSao_qRenCDjnE/
2617432
1798799
[quicwg/base-drafts] Explicitly permit starting over (#1621)[quicwg/base-drafts] Explicitly permit starting over (#1621)
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XY7SjBv0dqq9KZwh-IKqEEJaIwY/
2617429
1798796
[quicwg/base-drafts] d24747: Explicitly permit starting over[quicwg/base-drafts] d24747: Explicitly permit starting over
Martin Thomson
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/xT7LhIcsQjlD1qz_Ng1xMYl8zFU/
2617428
1798795
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Christian Huitema
2018-08-01
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KkpvHk7ZEXvJuaafMVyPAEojc0c/
2617421
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/StqtIqR0X4jGfK9cryNlLu3MtBQ/
2617398
1798778
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fetOFmzQFgEBErdI590BakRVmSo/
2617397
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CANCEL_PUSH, MAX_PUSH_ID and GOAWAY specify the length of the ID twice (#1620)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CANCEL_PUSH, MAX_PUSH_ID and GOAWAY specify the length of the ID twice (#1620)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/d7Eso4lFRptT0HJe0slRf_kXNro/
2617395
1798702
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest acknowledged consistently (#1611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest acknowledged consistently (#1611)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yr7NAJ4ycJ0HNIf-mLIIg3xMOHU/
2617366
1798501
[quicwg/base-drafts] b3a05e: Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)[quicwg/base-drafts] b3a05e: Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/biFdOoPgoo6Kod_EY2kgav0G4B8/
2617365
1798760
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What if the packet number of a retry packet is not zero? (#1448)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What if the packet number of a retry packet is not zero? (#1448)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ype_lwRNyKmTRxVhY1RaeMEk7wM/
2617359
1790056
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Looping with multiple Retry packets (#1451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Looping with multiple Retry packets (#1451)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0cDxDLNBSNKrKIXHflx0-WyR_0I/
2617358
1790127
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Looping with multiple Retry packets (#1451)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Looping with multiple Retry packets (#1451)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1q-evgL_Z-gVQx2s0evlddAcocA/
2617357
1790127
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Yqp8m3cllyzNQ0uTaUwgcUw9bQA/
2617249
1797929
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/K-xpNH1lCzIvX60uL-Attr8qquw/
2617236
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
MartinThompson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/33bdDqZYTXJxbQMp2A-8HNbGLwE/
2617235
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Marten Seemann
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/S4ZzOamtkhwIAiqQuZI0NnqZwXw/
2617234
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mHN8yQk-G330FdSeS5fJz6cLHkg/
2617221
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP SETTINGS: define setting content encoding (#1556)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP SETTINGS: define setting content encoding (#1556)
afrind
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G3xqfs2Tr6EkxUg9X53CeRqqYtc/
2617219
1795564
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
MikkelFJ
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1hJwltVKmW7g-lcDXbRu2tDkdUQ/
2617217
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts] CANCEL_PUSH, MAX_PUSH_ID and GOAWAY specify the length of the ID twice (#1620)[quicwg/base-drafts] CANCEL_PUSH, MAX_PUSH_ID and GOAWAY specify the length of the ID twice (#1620)
afrind
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5xaxN2wfUqPOtOGzofmaMbz63WY/
2617216
1798702
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
MikkelFJ
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/osptwKL_SKFmW1f--o_EYOHwxrQ/
2617213
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Christian Huitema
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jrYSyl6bvSEJYk3SngaExDd7kEE/
2617212
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vHW7IJ31f7yZgsd_c8meYvUf4Jg/
2617211
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts] f98993: Do not use undefined term "successful processing" ...[quicwg/base-drafts] f98993: Do not use undefined term "successful processing" ...
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3R_v6mCHV4t_7olYYY4s6v-HnQ4/
2617210
1798701
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do not use undefined term "successful processing" (#1589)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do not use undefined term "successful processing" (#1589)
afrind
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4DiV0uouodQoQWjHyu0vvJwiscw/
2617209
1797202
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Only ack headers that have non-zero declared Largest Reference (#1605)
afrind
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/KeMn6DNrrDYgBnGZhjjWXtGPPjY/
2617206
1797929
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Christian Huitema
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/G-pZDg2_wLxY0nxEWcCi5jRVtq0/
2617205
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3sUhlTSCJCjBNSHIB03ZXnFAFOc/
2617196
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nbaeYpBth_U2GMyYOkbPH5ozbK4/
2617182
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9BpF75h_qIXZ901j25suyTQ2IEI/
2617176
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jb-0RVtq0Y-1-6w5ZuNskt_Zc8U/
2617163
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss application-limited congestion control in Recovery (#1619)[quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss application-limited congestion control in Recovery (#1619)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bJnkb6MuJhwiSIqBeC6EvYbGNj0/
2617146
1798676
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9Gw-wY1AGCMoTPfShV_sZWAKQGk/
2617108
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
MikkelFJ
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1B7z_2vSnmfys3e-YSp2GCZx2W8/
2617098
1798608