Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)

Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com> Tue, 31 July 2018 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9682D126F72 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 08:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wa10NF-mqLKA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC6B126CC7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 08:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 08:15:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1533050137; bh=6z0hb2x11vFDKbF4RBFpb5vzsc88tvxWo/pepd8UnIw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DTrc2leLOxBJZXbtbHOJTF2SChhFbZz/GFjHy6T1bSSftTYOEA4lhcEXkRY9dLgSO 3PNRe34a7XdGLN9AIEuAC7V7UdcNj2LhZZS2J+4HzoW2H6+JxSOCwR7lbpM/Kl8Jjl WYDIHnQorCJEx6b4uQq6XOO8+KdkZOE90z8adKHY=
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcd02abb2a38ba4e3c30048afc8c27e56870ffd3992cf0000000117783f1992a169ce149fd7cc@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612/409257267@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b607d192a65b_68fb3fc1906be61c923b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9BpF75h_qIXZ901j25suyTQ2IEI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:15:40 -0000

@siyengar, where do you see "sender MUST not reduce the window?"  I cannot find it in the drafts.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1612#issuecomment-409257267