Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)
ianswett
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qMB3Rr4veGTdyJdxYs_u87gdJ_g/
2686722
1823978
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Persistent Congestion Time Threshold (#2365)
ianswett
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kD_smTR-4GToJCJ_Cudo3-y6Sgc/
2686720
1823978
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)
Lucas Pardue
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1pOrhynN4MTCYTeav2p_LIzWgSk/
2686718
1684695
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss of only two packets can lead to an unrecoverable situation (#2267)
Nick Banks
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WyIsRnURoXFBwWpD30dulWBEVDM/
2686717
1821170
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)
MikkelFJ
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8nI8HagNgY-A8DUEHF2OLpQtojk/
2686715
1684695
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] End-to-Path Close Signal (#602)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] End-to-Path Close Signal (#602)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gRCvX0S2MVgZHvbh70bLhZyPADs/
2686707
1708084
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] End-to-Path Close Signal (#602)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] End-to-Path Close Signal (#602)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pmqFvJYGTCZ48nD2uqRXDJH5hUI/
2686708
1708084
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of loss and congestion (#632)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of loss and congestion (#632)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BZjKhHCSldakRyWGTA65QEUsIFk/
2686706
1709386
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of loss and congestion (#632)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] On-path calculation of loss and congestion (#632)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-JKPGBPTZe12FUWD9Zn2xvnuqP8/
2686705
1709386
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICMP and ICMPv6 PMTUD with asymmetric connection-ids (#1243)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICMP and ICMPv6 PMTUD with asymmetric connection-ids (#1243)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/oUp37ONvAMKrMz7_U--DX7xfM_Y/
2686703
1776483
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify IPv6 flow label for QUIC (#2348)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Specify IPv6 flow label for QUIC (#2348)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vbBwdnRR_gnte3EkOKPnxWCN_-I/
2686702
1823393
[quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)[quicwg/base-drafts] Be clearer about the purpose of disable_migration (#2389)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fWQLuuDjuG6fRYnNZOsL12IR2Bw/
2686699
1824851
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spoofed connection migration as a DoS vector (#2342)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Spoofed connection migration as a DoS vector (#2342)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/535fZg0x1XTUXe-v-hZMVguO0mA/
2686698
1823298
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PMTU probing of a path suspected of not supporting PMTU of 1280 (#2118)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PMTU probing of a path suspected of not supporting PMTU of 1280 (#2118)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ALXqW_NqAQQ8UDpufw4m4X2_C7s/
2686696
1819120
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PMTU probing of a path suspected of not supporting PMTU of 1280 (#2118)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PMTU probing of a path suspected of not supporting PMTU of 1280 (#2118)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/T_5OE5uGN-FX3yLj7lJbS5xWB78/
2686695
1819120
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Dead path timeout (#1638)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Dead path timeout (#1638)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FWmWvy6uU_SpXmsv3iVDcblbyOk/
2686694
1799676
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nothing can be sent when receiving a packet just after the idle close timer expires (#2347)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nothing can be sent when receiving a packet just after the idle close timer expires (#2347)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6ltFMfTmBRK8VVBoKkJ-kT3cbPE/
2686693
1823387
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nothing can be sent when receiving a packet just after the idle close timer expires (#2347)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nothing can be sent when receiving a packet just after the idle close timer expires (#2347)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iU12SDeqsIpkeVYYhwvjU5h0204/
2686690
1823387
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nothing can be sent when receiving a packet just after the idle close timer expires (#2347)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] nothing can be sent when receiving a packet just after the idle close timer expires (#2347)
Christian Huitema
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bC0x9uYD8vT1lSIr6RtJiqeOD0w/
2686689
1823387
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Where can you send CONNECTION_CLOSE (#2151)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Where can you send CONNECTION_CLOSE (#2151)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FYsMI8KE5qyuKPVZCkngwJxBZDs/
2686688
1819396
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mm2Q3MOCVEvb8R4K5dPmIE_woIY/
2686685
1818263
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)
Marten Seemann
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_mXIs2vpAIYucMoHu7e0CcZ9deo/
2686684
1818263
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Where can you send CONNECTION_CLOSE (#2151)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Where can you send CONNECTION_CLOSE (#2151)
Christian Huitema
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YJWntR773MMK8qltRKVFYDp4H3E/
2686683
1819396
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] encoding of CONNECTION_CLOSE reason phrases (#1990)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] encoding of CONNECTION_CLOSE reason phrases (#1990)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7SuF5wIqMOnCb5YIDcMTAo_EQjw/
2686682
1815167
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] encoding of CONNECTION_CLOSE reason phrases (#1990)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] encoding of CONNECTION_CLOSE reason phrases (#1990)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/l9C_33WnNKREzoFFQ_J_QmWzek4/
2686681
1815167
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Articulate principles for definition of error codes (#2388)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Articulate principles for definition of error codes (#2388)
ianswett
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1-xmn9BjKg31uzmkvdIUEOYQ2oM/
2686680
1824846
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] frame type field of CONNECTION_CLOSE provides little value (#1989)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] frame type field of CONNECTION_CLOSE provides little value (#1989)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/emvyWDNV-7mT498bE8-0TfyM7OI/
2686679
1815166
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] frame type field of CONNECTION_CLOSE provides little value (#1989)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] frame type field of CONNECTION_CLOSE provides little value (#1989)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BDr8CE27tMb3FtZUj-3tNgfwhcY/
2686678
1815166
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)
Lucas Pardue
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rOcMczvJPR44hLhbYLuMP-WkxRo/
2686677
1684695
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/QUIC without Alt-Svc? (#253)
MikkelFJ
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8vvjkdOpXO6GLTo4C2RakLTRYDQ/
2686675
1684695
[quicwg/base-drafts] Articulate principles for definition of error codes (#2388)[quicwg/base-drafts] Articulate principles for definition of error codes (#2388)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/K0U9yGICQQ3ysnTa_Adhia3F1Qw/
2686674
1824846
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Error code for acknowledgment of a packet that was never sent (#2319)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Error code for acknowledgment of a packet that was never sent (#2319)
Christian Huitema
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/u1z4XFmgnfV_s1xOe6mwHhlLLZc/
2686673
1822259
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eCxpvy0kM9Tf7z0-baBQiVnnkOY/
2686671
1818263
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)
ianswett
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BtQ0Jy66np_-NX44ljI8IUQaqIY/
2686669
1818263
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)
Mike Bishop
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/m6MHHk2j14MLOxutxnosYtkyyUI/
2686668
1818263
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8JgvcoO0wPDP_RzL2DiDUub3-Og/
2686666
1683696
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zqRRes1pN-s9VgvByCQRIDGt6sI/
2686667
1683696
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how many connection IDs the peer is willing to store (#1994)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how many connection IDs the peer is willing to store (#1994)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Hx4tqJv3dS137U7236uGYHLbw9A/
2686665
1815245
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should retiring all CIDs be an error? (#2101)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IeKA3VtDeS39Hq7cd0rKMca7elA/
2686664
1818263
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not be ACK-eliciting (#2372)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PATH_* frames should not be ACK-eliciting (#2372)
Martin Thomson
2019-01-30
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/n7X8HQ3tVzkWuR3PL8y7oElo1_8/
2686662
1824469