Subject
From
Date
List
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/xhEY1bDYyOhXbwCKD1GSiX-hB90/
2941775
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/6KuVgdgibuNRLRhD6Ew7Tvr5sGQ/
2941785
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-14
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/ULb5d1G8FZ5fWswQ45s5e693DzM/
2941807
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/QcymzkJZ1nLKxgW4yKNl2caBA70/
2948070
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/14neQZFoxvOpiKqPXiNhPFkWbw4/
2948091
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/oE_4iXek8OBwLhr29dtYbQFhmNs/
2948092
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/Qq1zKxkKxjXt36KcfTJY9pXqkgI/
2948093
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/UO7Fdc9uvOU6WgR0Mi89lMIuNQQ/
2948099
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/fyskUsVBhmapHRcn4PyQtvY-WXU/
2948100
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/QkSE_nxPQ2aLw7G3IRBiyjQOk_Q/
2948125
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-29
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/m0eFfyG3AfmFu9osly3SRfA2dOE/
2955503
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Waltermire
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/rxQxy2KUrlc2WPVmzTAj7F8ECMk/
2998898
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/_Iz7Ko0xADDCGpqoAkTnyCXxCDE/
2998954
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/RcXR50HPqH76l3XT7JA-H3qACwE/
2998961
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/JdgjUkbx0jBXC9hxP2gl9DEOiEM/
2998962
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/pkZ7hThItYPCVRQmXB-j0s_9Jls/
2998965
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/dX8TtkoYjWA0YySC5Q5-UlN7G9k/
2998967
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/zNhZyVS9bHwE8bEwFv_bDI-dmNg/
2998974
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/ydus3Aj9aOnsiHvH1r4Z23mi34I/
2998981
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Kemp
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/cI3S5W_3zkM1ImJD8Snb8uGzyg0/
2999072
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/c3nK7cjH1iYekEdGhbB4--1gXdU/
2999109
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Kemp
2021-02-18
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/ENxH9gqAddiaGs0Xg6JZ5T6QUso/
2999123
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
David Kemp
2021-02-19
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/2PAc380zsSeiMRy0jMLbzwJdypI/
2999536
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-19
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/luDzB36j21gj_f8mf8FWYgTRLN0/
2999546
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
cabo
2021-02-19
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/X2KVuVCNbkqGAtfnKVDxWEsT4vA/
2999626
1917605
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
Henk Birkholz
2021-02-21
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/pgZQ0q9Qim64JGnqdpUL_g0T4X0/
3000245
1917605
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-12
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/wbKCNt_4HwOOCGcIB1QZQpZnDTw/
2941028
1917347
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-28
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/qZZ_mu3iXZp16Fj5fBR3lrY1RBo/
2948071
1917347
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-29
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/L5kzq4Kj_O_HnF1oPSE48LXt_c0/
2955510
1917347
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-29
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/ev_5jnwoteovMqYq2Li3-kcgmIk/
2955516
1917347
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
David Waltermire
2021-02-22
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/QY-GeEXzOzJ3Uq2W_eLxk9jO2BI/
3000382
1917347
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
David Waltermire
2021-02-22
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/sbddZ-EeBnxUNA4Zeqce0Xd3TBw/
3000926
1917347
[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-09
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/Vcm9kL6xJurkhyViyq2glzrW5gg/
2940296
1917007
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-27
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/4Re9bxRq-NoO7KFF5S5sMf5ru6A/
2947359
1917007
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-27
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/fhYwfpNJLmxS509PJM6Q5H4gXLA/
2947362
1917007
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-27
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/nrnxY0APbhyyPX4cq5keGgkLur8/
2947370
1917007
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-27
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/jrK6l9F0V4TbBdeI2tZjbD-OyAQ/
2947376
1917007
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-27
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/mpQ_zPdoJn5U2JN-PhQbarvcxIc/
2947432
1917007
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Thomas Fossati
2020-10-29
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/nBYKWVfSUj_bqJ1oflDv9rEMd40/
2955520
1917007
Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] are SWID and CoSWID isomorphic? (#27)
Henk Birkholz
2020-10-29
sacm
/arch/msg/sacm/QJ6zq_fIoxAKaT-_rboFJArwW78/
2955532
1917007