Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Eran Messeri
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9tP5-dHjp0UwcvxVeGDdkC9RJhU/
2391743
1702279
Re: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpointsRe: [Trans] Consolidating add-chain and add-pre-chain endpoints
Eran Messeri
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/SOx42hQATpsK3TOqV9ZvABUiWwo/
2391739
1702193
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/JHO5LDImGxnWpvjIhHJ9P-VWwmI/
2391703
1703573
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2`Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2`
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/wiHVtRMPpGfZONFzoe8ES4uXYsc/
2391691
1703566
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/VOfQHfyjvKPCU03FS2Lcyfj9KCM/
2391687
1703564
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH ageRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH age
trans issue tracker
2017-05-12
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vN95laFwpASVSjFMG_wBf2_03Kw/
2391652
1703549
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Y7tjIEDkXtK_9XF4vNY_BwACS04/
2391408
1701999
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rxwA5fra8Qagooly5U2GAwbXAxo/
2391406
1702689
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/BGhGKHxRwRx7mJbtAH9aOxajKxE/
2391403
1702731
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/KOZruiywS1Z3E0dHxb0XDqObosk/
2391402
1702647
[Trans] Seeking feedback: Simplification of get-entries in 6962-bis and associated data structures[Trans] Seeking feedback: Simplification of get-entries in 6962-bis and associated data structures
Eran Messeri
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/FRpgoEV2vM-c3XWrFQ4L0btkBLo/
2391209
1703337
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCTRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/zdtrmOroLOO1qHkBB-uPw2JqryM/
2391201
1701999
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bis[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bis
trans issue tracker
2017-05-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/zqd8vtOJy9YzT-B9niMq8Rnn_U8/
2391200
1703334
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/baq903vVTqbdZFkY_jIi66Qqkzw/
2390276
1702689
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/GX4yfzWsjiihutUYObRQhlSzbYA/
2390226
1702647
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/slDhAuH3WW1AvX9wManfViWe4fg/
2390224
1702731
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA
trans issue tracker
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/DUy_4QfFko3iHaKbvqDhM8O9G88/
2390192
1702935
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Eran Messeri
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Z761Yh3JwWfVMQYXFs1ZUIhuYPw/
2390187
1702731
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qUzImASh1AqAUWSbdnXqhmR0rMU/
2389864
1702731
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/p6HbhiPS_8zW7KKLqLowxwjGDEc/
2389844
1702731
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vuJTJ5o5ufMQxbjSaHiVcyIgHz0/
2389843
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Al Cutter
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/DQYeipmMvZdBezoXEvroN2dwrn4/
2389837
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Tom Ritter
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rkqB8dwxILTBJ79iOvcowjgNpgk/
2389804
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/851tkezX8c78XX8q6qgksFlpw7g/
2389800
1702279
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_pES1bhCxHuOihiyawNOO0fZi6w/
2389774
1702160
[Trans] Ticket 170[Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rqmakAfYB9HnkffCDWi9r09Ic98/
2389773
1702731
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/U9QEfCa_op-t_3Ln_K5CK-lOz0A/
2389675
1702689
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qSY7Wc8Zwp1tRHDqd_jF3pb259A/
2389657
1702689
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/f23FQacmFnzSJ9OXL9rKaxe-XdE/
2389647
1702647
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDsRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDs
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Rmb2pD8_lkvuiXU6f8hlrLF2i-4/
2389629
1701969
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/dYXstgzbLF7e5sSaI3VDrtlTuyo/
2389596
1702647
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/dM6_Lpnjw53ViM43QBCU2IA8Fdo/
2389585
1702160
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/2sCsL7D0REh4xm7gcyg1dnloX4A/
2389555
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/eAmPSWdNtD1DGpvOGVAEe2Hu3ck/
2389554
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/a0THR1hpjhuoOBiGue5pPZHFV3w/
2389532
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storingRe: [Trans] What logs are storing
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ISlpUaNY0lQCEicMAPnoebTAG60/
2389401
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/WJDaxNQS_CghnIyHjpDVpYjSOoY/
2389397
1702279
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/kD59qckPc27kw4Rgtcd9LipXShU/
2389395
1702158
[Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)[Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/IiiYHeqdIH3BQrPu5F9__QpiUpc/
2389393
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/nZvgFulyWT3XR3NQM8D8X0NE7JM/
2389390
1702279