Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CTRe: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CT
Rick Andrews
2015-04-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Frsy8whVsMb-RGiDET13mvLlr9s/
1926456
1646664
Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSARe: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA
Watson Ladd
2015-04-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ERuZxiwCipT3FukvOJGMuv8VJ4w/
1926408
1646653
Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSARe: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2015-04-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qHB8mS9PGK08J2H0FMQWIcOw1wE/
1926396
1646653
Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSARe: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA
Russ Housley
2015-04-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rDq7eQdG5shIizUk_h90GjRkzRs/
1926332
1646653
[Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA[Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA
trans issue tracker
2015-04-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Py5VJ3tGDkW9D64qCSksaYiHExg/
1926320
1646653
Re: [Trans] [trans] #82 (rfc6962-bis): add integrity validation to get-entries (and fetching SCTs?)Re: [Trans] [trans] #82 (rfc6962-bis): add integrity validation to get-entries (and fetching SCTs?)
trans issue tracker
2015-04-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/J4eWE4unjCCJU4OdNGb7LUHJ7pg/
1926155
1646654
Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CTRe: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CT
Linus Nordberg
2015-04-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ulGqlcdHQPes8r5FgayMLWBKulM/
1926126
1646664
Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CTRe: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CT
Stephen Kent
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/jMWaONlONmv6ErorCIO8pIPHT5E/
1925806
1646664
Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CTRe: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysis for CT
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/GxibFscQPutj9aItxcqidskhqQ4/
1925706
1646664
[Trans] [trans] #82 (client-behavior): add integrity validation to get-entries (and fetching SCTs?)[Trans] [trans] #82 (client-behavior): add integrity validation to get-entries (and fetching SCTs?)
trans issue tracker
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vI87sDrpYt_A34b6BUWhwCaiRrY/
1925521
1646654
Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CTRe: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CT
Salz, Rich
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/dJhToDrdzxEYy7UzHpmcDM9y7Is/
1925454
1646664
Re: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificateRe: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate
trans issue tracker
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Ac6KggvvHpzy9N6pnJztk9HefeY/
1925350
1646659
Re: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CTRe: [Trans] Poll for adoption of working group draft on threat analysisfor CT
Rob Stradling
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/R0SnYqXOB78A5ewrm35WFA7p1oM/
1925342
1646664
Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Rob Stradling
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/l2kK1qY5VoPddDlO8rDsr05MtwQ/
1925318
1646658
[Trans] [trans] #81 (rfc6962-bis): OIDs and IANA Considerations[Trans] [trans] #81 (rfc6962-bis): OIDs and IANA Considerations
trans issue tracker
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/wIbmfpxnpAuoBO32JUsqHrmMQAg/
1925317
1646655
[Trans] [trans] #80 (client-behavior): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate[Trans] [trans] #80 (client-behavior): Re-introduce the issuer key hash into the Precertificate
trans issue tracker
2015-03-31
trans
/arch/msg/trans/k0WBIcZOTZZqRwpsZyvUZ2ZAl9Y/
1925312
1646656
[Trans] Minutes uploaded[Trans] Minutes uploaded
Melinda Shore
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/3xC3lmAgjQPdX7bIpPm1U1jQDRg/
1925013
1646657
Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documentsRe: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
Melinda Shore
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/0v33eRRo7Zza_NUnrEyMAdoZHSA/
1924965
1646658
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Warren Kumari
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/g9p4-DMMJBrD606quv3u5RLxV70/
1924807
1646680
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Salz, Rich
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/aaCH0w_ZuNwUEFuncTuJDo7TtfI/
1924798
1646680
Re: [Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)Re: [Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)
Nico Williams
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6pM5K9Cs2a5EezNnzdC6ITdq-oo/
1924767
1646680
Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG documentRe: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG document
Russ Housley
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8COKt67AaQDaT-bF463BeJvlb24/
1924751
1646680
Re: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificateRe: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate
Erwann Abalea
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/fsZCnjY82jO-bUUtc1Dd_pfXScc/
1924628
1646659
Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG documentRe: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG document
Rob Stradling
2015-03-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/0a10vG7kbwQZ-N3WcACFK26VJsM/
1924605
1646680
Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG documentRe: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG document
Russ Housley
2015-03-29
trans
/arch/msg/trans/AKfsVy68d1M8P-jnmY9asiJ0_7I/
1924437
1646680
Re: [Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)Re: [Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)
Melinda Shore
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/EnKFQNyrHvPWrTDIJsK5ASu95NQ/
1924240
1646680
[Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)[Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)
Massimiliano Pala
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/3xw3bA87VpYr6j2_Rg0ojbqq890/
1924234
1646680
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Leif Johansson
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/daKZcXeLTKqbpEMw1Xm559MiFZc/
1924218
1646680
[Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG document[Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG document
Massimiliano Pala
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/3PggDrIoDRaGPGPUi7qFIzIVeAE/
1924150
1646680
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Salz, Rich
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/JWDhaZKUPCem65m-7caNm9sJTRU/
1924141
1646680
Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]
Tom Ritter
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/-Ik6NpSqpJtQJJyAOeC0vEdDMbA/
1924113
1646661
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Massimiliano Pala
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/BSB4IW6oLdAFtKfNGjJHfbCzXL8/
1924097
1646680
Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]
Tao Effect
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/AeumbogztZbt-I5pW19PRHOjaL4/
1924096
1646661
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Melinda Shore
2015-03-28
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8rxgAkp_t19RbGElMZ2r-YIVixY/
1924090
1646680
Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]
Tao Effect
2015-03-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/n1HUdNFrd-KZXaDDYie0LhN9Wnw/
1924089
1646661
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Massimiliano Pala
2015-03-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8nXX0QZ0i2tg8H2C6PAutPD8shc/
1924084
1646680
Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]
paul
2015-03-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/dY-41-OtHdagx-7-S9DWD3lIZdU/
1924046
1646661
Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]
Tao Effect
2015-03-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/7Ryj--bx822vqI7-5YZqO26N1rU/
1923980
1646661
Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]
Paul Wouters
2015-03-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/R-LYmtYGye6fd-J175NwPsNb7mM/
1923971
1646661
Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]Re: [Trans] Question regarding new gossip protocols [Was: Certificate transparency on blockchains]
Dmitry Belyavsky
2015-03-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/lVeEFjaDAwGwEvH57T1FTk7mBRY/
1923949
1646661