Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-01Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-01
Benjamin Kaduk
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/I85CB_SUYIcRDMVXrvg8jq2q1y8/
1919194
1646669
Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01
Linus Nordberg
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/QWJtD_JbSOEgrHwXu7tsuQh1KvY/
1919014
1646669
Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01
Linus Nordberg
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/pVn6xSASAOG2HOyfKYmMnS2lFeo/
1919013
1646669
Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01Re: [Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01
Tom Ritter
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/krMW0h1iZt5lFrNb4Aits2Ik89U/
1918909
1646669
[Trans] comments on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-07[Trans] comments on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-07
Benjamin Kaduk
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9d8wBD539B3udLD7PwOMzcq0d1M/
1918908
1646666
[Trans] comments on draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-01[Trans] comments on draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-01
Benjamin Kaduk
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/pUfvjRq-sIpl1xX5kJCf0s_ac5Y/
1918892
1646667
[Trans] On version expectations of trans participants[Trans] On version expectations of trans participants
Benjamin Kaduk
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/WPRn5goQqdYIxvux9QDnjIHmH-I/
1918890
1646668
[Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01[Trans] comments on draft-linux-trans-gossip-ct-01
Benjamin Kaduk
2015-03-23
trans
/arch/msg/trans/23AgwuzC32a2g5Is1dbjYJrAuzc/
1918887
1646669
Re: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCT
Russ Housley
2015-03-22
trans
/arch/msg/trans/cXQ1et0T_tnT02gDpyxUUK78_WM/
1918624
1646714
[Trans] Slides, please![Trans] Slides, please!
Melinda Shore
2015-03-21
trans
/arch/msg/trans/g62GhLQjkOWA1BZacHmcHzSmids/
1918317
1646670
Re: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCT
Melinda Shore
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rOKZj3bN3zj-T8FSVqqB2g6njlo/
1917928
1646714
Re: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCT
Stephen Kent
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6ddCSxk7NAilWCJqxyt0F8ZYax0/
1917904
1646714
[Trans] [trans] #78 (client-behavior): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate[Trans] [trans] #78 (client-behavior): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qwxS3pBTPsYSJ8yPFaFAsbhqqtg/
1917893
1646671
[Trans] [trans] #77 (client-behavior): normative client behavior specified in Section 5[Trans] [trans] #77 (client-behavior): normative client behavior specified in Section 5
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/p3VJet-bCD3xixPFxp_YbkKl9DM/
1917892
1646672
[Trans] [trans] #76 (client-behavior): Normative client behavior specified in Section 3.4[Trans] [trans] #76 (client-behavior): Normative client behavior specified in Section 3.4
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/TUGbepVUwaPh8j70q8HKA1uee2w/
1917889
1646673
[Trans] [trans] #75 (client-behavior): run on sentence in section 3[Trans] [trans] #75 (client-behavior): run on sentence in section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rzw9kO76YB8Edds-uri8ZztzoAg/
1917887
1646674
[Trans] [trans] #74 (client-behavior): normative statement of TLS client behavior in Section 3[Trans] [trans] #74 (client-behavior): normative statement of TLS client behavior in Section 3
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/P-yDbGYSHPjW2UBJCeCwIy4SWU0/
1917886
1646675
[Trans] [trans] #73 (client-behavior): Section 3 text re log cert validation is ambiguous[Trans] [trans] #73 (client-behavior): Section 3 text re log cert validation is ambiguous
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/3jQXZQWfNkS4Z-vteLefXM0qFv4/
1917885
1646676
[Trans] [trans] #72 (client-behavior): Section 2.1.4 cites specific algorithms[Trans] [trans] #72 (client-behavior): Section 2.1.4 cites specific algorithms
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/M5XbvvW6-hpkVLeUC4PAB1TjUtE/
1917884
1646677
[Trans] [trans] #71 (client-behavior): Section 1 does not define mis-issuance[Trans] [trans] #71 (client-behavior): Section 1 does not define mis-issuance
trans issue tracker
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/aSpS2Vhv6Whh-q1lfaBo5NDhKFw/
1917882
1646678
[Trans] Clarification on Precertificate Signing Certificates[Trans] Clarification on Precertificate Signing Certificates
Linus Nordberg
2015-03-20
trans
/arch/msg/trans/NguuuX6lkvTW8EMxI6d3pIZ4dUk/
1917694
1646679
Re: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntaxRe: [Trans] [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax
Manger, James
2015-03-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/PKvxlfTV91oHi_BTP9i1Hy7DIuM/
1916213
1646680
Re: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCT
Ben Laurie
2015-03-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Uupw9rfZJnNvigK7i3qSelF2298/
1915585
1646714
[Trans] Follow-up on closing the SCT encoding issue[Trans] Follow-up on closing the SCT encoding issue
Melinda Shore
2015-03-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/JvaWxYL_QVJ6BubdvyBn55deD0A/
1915523
1646681
Re: [Trans] One, not three gossip draftsRe: [Trans] One, not three gossip drafts
Melinda Shore
2015-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/-ThPNkd7pcu4OAYNc6NJud4sHds/
1915462
1646682
[Trans] One, not three gossip drafts (was: Agenda uploaded)[Trans] One, not three gossip drafts (was: Agenda uploaded)
Linus Nordberg
2015-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/RNzS3fY0l5UedpJuUgIL1f2sUN0/
1915425
1646682
[Trans] Agenda uploaded[Trans] Agenda uploaded
Melinda Shore
2015-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/1jWsVV7STQ9uW4co878OZVdD7I8/
1915381
1646682
Re: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCT
Stephen Kent
2015-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/i5-CwUzdK3_IYt25khCIVASRego/
1915232
1646714
Re: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCT
Russ Housley
2015-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/6h9McqTmBc2T6u1_mEXKbO9tclM/
1915204
1646714
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Nico Williams
2015-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/fISMX697dsmi9fXCoqqPEFN-87E/
1915196
1646683
Re: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCTRe: [Trans] [trans] #34 (rfc6962-bis): use of RFC 5246 syntax to define the SCT
Rob Stradling
2015-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/zLWJ69Ku8h8bClmylbVXh95c8a4/
1915022
1646714
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Paul Wouters
2015-03-14
trans
/arch/msg/trans/-UnAYffcS9bEek0hNif3irux5kg/
1914536
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Nico Williams
2015-03-14
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9aDy__-htdQm8tYdSUDMT4RcUiU/
1914505
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Erwann Abalea
2015-03-13
trans
/arch/msg/trans/bakH-mX7RI6FMrgwJbjdHxb90Ug/
1914483
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Stephen Farrell
2015-03-13
trans
/arch/msg/trans/2kjfWbKnL72BvVMuSmgMcyobULM/
1914449
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Rob Stradling
2015-03-13
trans
/arch/msg/trans/bn09cXbHms5Gg6wjxpDawWmffwk/
1914442
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Rob Stradling
2015-03-13
trans
/arch/msg/trans/f5IFtS8CTiZZeWsFNSWpuoSXTuo/
1914438
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Russ Housley
2015-03-13
trans
/arch/msg/trans/thhwyk3faGyFevU4e_7JVofyDkw/
1914434
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Stephen Farrell
2015-03-13
trans
/arch/msg/trans/leqVAvVNjs-hcWX3dJMUAsqcFsg/
1914433
1646683
Re: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussionRe: [Trans] Bad Technical Decision: Closing out the SCT encoding discussion
Russ Housley
2015-03-13
trans
/arch/msg/trans/y-UTtTAOS9wvdHudafqJY-ooRRk/
1914432
1646683