Re: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelinesRe: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines
Michael Welzl
2023-09-29
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/HLay780Z1a6AlEg7hiGXExkaeLk/
3361544
2080591
Re: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelinesRe: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines
Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-22
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/VbWCCTGY7FEp5ymgAq66CeuAZbE/
3358853
2080591
Re: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelinesRe: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines
Bob Briscoe
2023-09-21
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DHAq1duJlbYibgL2cGVmAGInC64/
3358603
2080591
Re: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelinesRe: [tsvwg] Progress with draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines
Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-13
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/A0D7qjFGKRNfrargKvfPAGpT0ac/
3354995
2080591
Re: [tsvwg] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-27Re: [tsvwg] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-27
Bernard Aboba
2022-08-05
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ml_qL89tJ4J7R-S7OYlNLOqw74I/
3208789
2023313
Re: [tsvwg] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-27Re: [tsvwg] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-27
Bob Briscoe
2022-08-04
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/JHry9WE_k6Q2gts0ItxIZXggck4/
3208763
2023313
[tsvwg] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-27[tsvwg] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-27
Bernard Aboba via Datatracker
2022-07-29
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/0_gb030ijgxb-JbNyWxcqsklsyo/
3206880
2023313
Re: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S draftsRe: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S drafts
Bob Briscoe
2021-11-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/FiWPi3WrIf9mYSth2AFSD3OrUXM/
3093022
1965470
Re: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S draftsRe: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S drafts
Bob Briscoe
2021-11-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/F3MlbyxzMEeJ76u5Z39JW3YVY4U/
3092611
1965470
Re: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S draftsRe: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S drafts
Bob Briscoe
2021-11-05
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/qeJg3i5dsxQMDpAxIT2p3ShKO3Q/
3091401
1965470
Re: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S draftsRe: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S drafts
Gorry Fairhurst
2021-11-05
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/tjxg0SsdlL9E_2jZMRD4dl59hP4/
3091383
1965470
Re: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S draftsRe: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S drafts
Sebastian Moeller
2021-11-05
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Qo2bYg1hUXv7c8-gpU2Cm5JweLc/
3091381
1965470
Re: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S draftsRe: [tsvwg] start of WGLC on L4S drafts
Gorry Fairhurst
2021-10-28
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/EJODczvSqEcbG3A6mMHFyzBTQjw/
3089234
1965470
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-05-05
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/n6vXWm5SdROU7OzxMzkcFuX-ujI/
3030585
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Lloyd W
2021-03-18
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/8Zi3777w959rxu0pBJn78cocmsc/
3011675
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-16
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/kBQ6Wj291kMDiQ4kWRqAEt3yXcE/
3010530
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-10
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/150NplXjZ_rKvWN0oHrVk9F2sNg/
3008191
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-10
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/nvoNVFLuH38IblfrgfiaHihDaAE/
3008142
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-10
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/sLnntBjYgQ-OsxB5lNqesqi_56s/
3008000
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Ian Swett
2021-03-10
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/u60lu5s1wk9hKQx11oSYI5vHXGA/
3007947
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/TG1Z-tt4OBTl9F3wXZT7gKwy3rY/
3007838
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/NL6txokiNbSWuDu4SWI7ha2uu5M/
3007835
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Jonathan Morton
2021-03-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ipqb6B4GxNPWrpaB6SLzE0T_As4/
3007421
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Ian Swett
2021-03-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Y5Zf4i2GlXWUF1_kxDlWw8lcq14/
3007278
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Neal Cardwell
2021-03-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/spczSBAMAI8z_DCpxlgMWhhADQ4/
3007271
1943069
[tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?[tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-09
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/bPN5ryfKHN1VsrAfO7jq-cvrCbY/
3007247
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)
Bob Briscoe
2020-05-19
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/-uFazVf2tupkK011Y5ps83ENCvc/
2881272
1894082
Re: [tsvwg] [nwcrg] WGLC on FECFRAME sliding window extensions and RLC FECRe: [tsvwg] [nwcrg] WGLC on FECFRAME sliding window extensions and RLC FEC
Emmanuel Lochin
2018-05-02
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/cUwK2Dy5jShlCltRv5Ql7BcoJwk/
2578122
1781137
Re: [tsvwg] [nwcrg] WGLC on FECFRAME sliding window extensions and RLC FECRe: [tsvwg] [nwcrg] WGLC on FECFRAME sliding window extensions and RLC FEC
Vincent Roca
2018-05-02
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/R05a-5D8k8ua50zn6g8Txe2o16w/
2578110
1781137
Re: [tsvwg] [nwcrg] WGLC on FECFRAME sliding window extensions and RLC FECRe: [tsvwg] [nwcrg] WGLC on FECFRAME sliding window extensions and RLC FEC
Emmanuel Lochin
2018-05-01
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/YOKM-i143j30tnaBco29d1uZhxU/
2577710
1781137
Re: [tsvwg] draft-han-tsvwg-cc (was: Re: Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101)Re: [tsvwg] draft-han-tsvwg-cc (was: Re: Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101)
Toerless Eckert
2018-03-12
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/vN1dxncRCposWFTUcelepCc_l_I/
2555628
1772952
Re: [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101Re: [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101
Emmanuel Lochin
2018-03-05
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/1koxyumDVgoBfN1jb4NuLLjxpTY/
2551648
1772952
Re: [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101Re: [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101
Yingzhen Qu
2018-03-04
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/EHM659RWTxIbOwYlORZboFIIi3o/
2551327
1772952
Re: [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101Re: [tsvwg] Agenda requests for TSVWG@IETF101
Emmanuel Lochin
2018-03-04
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/m1NXRlmP_H3wLZy_E2GJlJocfVU/
2551144
1772952
[tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-05.txt> (Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation) to Proposed Standard[tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-05.txt> (Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation) to Proposed Standard
The IESG
2017-09-05
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/0GfxlDztN_euZR0AVFlxC6cnrx8/
2441086
1724323
[tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-05.txt> (Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation) to Proposed Standard[tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-05.txt> (Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation) to Proposed Standard
The IESG
2017-08-31
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/XGVivG2QzjbyVZRG8JkIBedNsFY/
2440056
1723975
Re: [tsvwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)Re: [tsvwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell
2016-10-14
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/PpxgUTS94ZEoo7uO663J5es3bhM/
2284712
1651244
Re: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)Re: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)
Benoit Claise
2016-10-14
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/PVetlDv-WaAVt4W4PmlWzuQRS7g/
2284651
1651242
Re: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)Re: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)
Eggert, Lars
2016-10-14
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/xmV297QOIDNPsDRp0cTr2niDzRo/
2284645
1651242
Re: [tsvwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)Re: [tsvwg] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-18: (with COMMENT)
Eggert, Lars
2016-10-14
tsvwg
None
/arch/msg/tsvwg/eG2FVVBvu11eaMDZr3mmoL9h0m0/
2284642
1651244