Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
James Woodyatt
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/PE8TK3AC-O5gODq3KYVq9fnPl4A/
1920966
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Philip Matthews
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/jDqQamGXyXONnuwkobE0VlfIh4Y/
1920607
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Brian E Carpenter
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/pcFHCTsskDVznkZ2YpwXQ0YjhkE/
1920463
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Ca By
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/fYMu8JE7UNG6EJAUqSpfNEOn07w/
1920394
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Lorenzo Colitti
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/qrJQgWF1YwSh7poT4hVpkFN39kE/
1920333
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
James Woodyatt
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3LLsphDB4ZD5O_LAV8tythySNYE/
1920293
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Victor Kuarsingh
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/-3zPuw8PW6bXt1njsyuJSYI7VjA/
1920265
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Lorenzo Colitti
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/0RJWCEXXznBSTjUGUBS93n64NyY/
1920221
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Ca By
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/T6JU3pCKp5W9rGfHNke6TJYS8KY/
1920220
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/MidBTxHtkBt5NAEBHLfgehTM7eE/
1920215
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Francis Dupont
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/2M3Jqx1_UVo_Mx2_TByMAXIzNRk/
1920210
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Metzler, Dan J
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/HGwDXRWaRkQXnL2fs94mRmkOTrI/
1920202
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Lorenzo Colitti
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/OhiKXl3WcB03LLeIroOhJM2tiMc/
1920159
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Lorenzo Colitti
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/abSaYO4W6oDFjso9EHwuiXH0aVg/
1920157
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Victor Kuarsingh
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/CsFT4kpi1aH2e8Bl26PeqPujB34/
1920002
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Fernando Gont
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/lAFZ_KyVCqG8wGLpjGp0DDWyfL0/
1919978
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Alexandru Petrescu
2015-03-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4hYenyUNa6AqfOql2-NZDfUyn-o/
1919973
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Hemant Singh (shemant)
2015-03-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/eSkKNfpqbdWhNuaEksdUPbB6V3E/
1919955
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Mark ZZZ Smith
2015-03-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/GrFBRLbMXXDZCJFOipXHMi3P_eM/
1919911
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Alexandru Petrescu
2015-03-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/H04Z9rkTLfRgR-QEd5PmwyYFe3I/
1919496
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Ca By
2015-03-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/A-dn67Z8z2Iv1mFgE44T_GTe6UA/
1919345
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Ted Lemon
2015-03-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ei0dCKZvTwf-kxGz2fe4NggEXrE/
1919048
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Victor Kuarsingh
2015-03-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/DGhqaoolbVtenKJ9c1McrZgmhEA/
1919043
1659648
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Xing Li
2015-03-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/IiZMAcZMnX_JJPjDGaYiXDXw7Bo/
1918706
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
2015-03-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/oimDZGEGQAGAG6RtVAB2BMVeK04/
1917812
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt
2015-03-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/15VLrnIjWNdtKiQbLALRxapp6Nw/
1917698
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Tore Anderson
2015-03-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/RzaMV6YpGcF9R6cjrRgaJoZ1jBc/
1917693
1659642
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Ray Hunter
2015-03-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/jonuFvAKHBVJc4iHPdDxsufU9W8/
1917686
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packetsRe: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packets
Nick Hilliard
2015-03-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yddmda86_JY67rVo_C-M5GDsxBA/
1917661
1659643
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/leZz1ecLygm45gKb4-SZsmtbDDQ/
1917611
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packetsRe: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packets
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/CZq_nlE_3B9AmA6ja6P9wECPzBc/
1917499
1659643
Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficientRe: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Fred Baker (fred)
2015-03-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/MRi9-D3lkiFPFivad0uzr_6hTHw/
1917498
1659642
[v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient[v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
Ca By
2015-03-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/HXELOiwWbwshcdWAf4jDkFwyXq0/
1917421
1659642
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Alexandru Petrescu
2015-03-18
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4-63K_Rzr_JNKFSyVBraC2JtpZg/
1916348
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packetsRe: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packets
Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-03-18
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/llP1oIrNTAe71TpIrUxbar_ifKE/
1916339
1659643
Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?Re: [v6ops] Should we use "unnumbered" in IPv6?
Falcon Darkstar Momot
2015-03-18
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5ygMpIxGvoIuP_o-T09yohfEGjI/
1916327
1659648
Re: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packetsRe: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packets
Mark Andrews
2015-03-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/hOUptP2MwuTjDJSWOpEyxuorw8w/
1916224
1659643
Re: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packetsRe: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packets
Nick Hilliard
2015-03-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3vhIOmIr1GQEjkxXRWyP23nCykY/
1916221
1659643
Re: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packetsRe: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packets
Mark Andrews
2015-03-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/V7V4JN2j6hpYDCt5sAIp3XEnweg/
1916216
1659643
Re: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packetsRe: [v6ops] Non-dest ASes dropping EH-enabledIPv6 packets
Brian E Carpenter
2015-03-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/CCInzSRsp13Hb2_x5mMHWpWS_gw/
1916100
1659643