Re: [104attendees] an IETF in India

Alejandro Acosta <alejandro@lacnic.net> Wed, 13 March 2019 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandro@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743381310E2 for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BlAkxSifDOdM for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [200.7.84.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0901310DD for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.lacnic.net.uy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AA316B40A6B for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:35:39 -0300 (UYT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lacnic.net.uy
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy ([127.0.0.1]) by hermes.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5Nm0w1wiQzv for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:35:36 -0300 (UYT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro-2.local (fsa056e19a.hygk209.ap.nuro.jp [160.86.225.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 400D116B408C4 for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:35:34 -0300 (UYT)
To: 104attendees@ietf.org
References: <962a5ec9-c60a-a989-90f2-482a67574bf8@seantek.com> <CAA=duU391biLONTU3jrHviMS8Aa07PTuaXyM-GiH2BHsL8hgog@mail.gmail.com> <D105DA70-A132-491F-ADD6-5B4EAE6F97D8@gmail.com> <A8143A75C4D32848AB4E59FFC8B8FBA84BDEA88F@SINEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> <F45D9786-6851-4D82-A3A6-D4CB950661ED@gmail.com> <527207a8-e6a7-597d-0e9d-57b1b468022c@seantek.com> <A8355357-1E8B-446D-8FE7-EBA411122814@gmail.com> <263ddb2d-c65b-00bf-d6cd-bc6f749f5c18@nic.cz> <7AA12587-E253-45CC-A3A7-AE32EDAA6A49@gmail.com> <38EDBD04-6D6D-4CD3-B186-C51624909159@gmail.com> <947826D6-4D45-4239-8631-4D9613421818@tzi.org> <CA+9_gVuCeMqzG2Odm6xnyFxQ4+RYArbOyLkiAcsSQ3C3JoyQdw@mail.gmail.com> <BCB694D7-F7D0-499D-8E5E-D4ACF36E3DDB@rfc1035.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903131303060.22356@bofh.nohats.ca> <501EEFEB-4A8E-4283-BDAB-EDEA2890C33C@juniper.net> <CALwVrALSNqfQb2o-57xuZ4KcNpT-gZRuhiHZfWhkbwS1HYq1fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandro@lacnic.net>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <080e6217-8e23-61df-b46c-d20f7ea19292@lacnic.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:35:32 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALwVrALSNqfQb2o-57xuZ4KcNpT-gZRuhiHZfWhkbwS1HYq1fg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E70E90F34D9562E3720413EC"
Content-Language: es-ES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/104attendees/Vv52ONAixTdRoQIqZx_RDKkbtCM>
Subject: Re: [104attendees] an IETF in India
X-BeenThere: 104attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 104 attendees for official communication <104attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/104attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:104attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 22:35:45 -0000

Is this the right place to discuss this? (btw: nothing againts the topic )

El 14/3/19 a las 02:15, Haunssey Chai escribió:
> Why am I being involved in all of this discussion?
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:13 Jeff Haas
> <jhaas=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org
> <mailto:40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>
>
>     > On Mar 13, 2019, at 13:07, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca
>     <mailto:paul@nohats.ca>> wrote:
>     >
>     > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Jim Reid wrote:
>     >
>     >>> Curious if any cities in India have been considered.
>     >>
>     >> If they have, I expect they’d be quickly eliminated. All
>     foreign visitors have to get a visa to visit India and the
>     application process is painful. Former colleagues have spent a day
>     waiting in the queue at the embassy to hand in their paperwork and
>     then do that all over again to pick up the visa.
>     >
>     > That's pretty obsolete information. The electronic visa thing
>     works fine
>     > now. I did have one odd thing only, as a european, the
>     instructions were
>     > to print my documents on A4 paper. Being in Canada, that turned
>     out to
>     > be harder than expected, unless I was willing to commit to
>     buying a few
>     > realms of paper. I called the consulate to confirm and they did
>     > recommend sticking to A4, so I artisanly cut some paper :)
>
>     I've traveled to India twice on e-visas.  Once I found a good
>     place to do the process, it was fairly straight forward.
>
>     The instructions you find in various places to do this process are
>     massively contradictory and confusing.
>
>     Given how much noise there was around the Thailand visa stuff,
>     we'll want to get the conflicting information streamlined if we're
>     considering India.
>
>     -- Jeff
>
>     -- 
>     104attendees mailing list
>     104attendees@ietf.org <mailto:104attendees@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees
>
>