IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [104attendees] an IETF in India

Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net> Wed, 13 March 2019 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96715131146 for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.85, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXb4xPD23BsQ for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5E7130FB8 for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108162.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2DHBje0026834; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:12:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=VBOGgHXehPGgvGpYvR90j8q2hj8UmQ+RxqMDR1Sud3w=; b=fIXLG7sJ45ksxHy7qN8h+oFR4zTXA6XLPb2IZuX3BdD6FfXFSCJ1dNW43+dsxPR5EjS1 v6HCjEpz0oLBHDFfSpxVDvtxjoDdN67ZoFP3b7UpxHkvyslVi7Y0d7rbTSMPGCCnVk6k uBSR2sUTKCj5fRDJIcz3YMqpoQGa4C2Y1RLO5NJuod9MSTNtHCXhItMrqSxEoq/NkMRG 90CoZZB2QQzv9n10cESEKScILyJZig5L0sTcHvZehe+DvAFsXPwCkx+Q86t/5pbVqyIi uIIrVyCB0srExs0xJgPNMylR8bSXbxqfN6AHiLMnihirR1yXdGH7cm5cTtYkE8pxwGiN IQ==
Received: from nam02-cy1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02lp2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.52]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2r7114rj6s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:12:45 -0700
Received: from MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.229.17) by MWHPR05MB3182.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.229.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1730.5; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:12:41 +0000
Received: from MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6ccb:c998:df88:9a3]) by MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6ccb:c998:df88:9a3%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1709.011; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:12:41 +0000
From: Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
CC: "104attendees@ietf.org" <104attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [104attendees] an IETF in India
Thread-Index: AQHU2b/3cDm8HabvykORlnWkbfMQFg==
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:12:41 +0000
Message-ID: <501EEFEB-4A8E-4283-BDAB-EDEA2890C33C@juniper.net>
References: <962a5ec9-c60a-a989-90f2-482a67574bf8@seantek.com> <CAA=duU391biLONTU3jrHviMS8Aa07PTuaXyM-GiH2BHsL8hgog@mail.gmail.com> <D105DA70-A132-491F-ADD6-5B4EAE6F97D8@gmail.com> <A8143A75C4D32848AB4E59FFC8B8FBA84BDEA88F@SINEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com> <F45D9786-6851-4D82-A3A6-D4CB950661ED@gmail.com> <527207a8-e6a7-597d-0e9d-57b1b468022c@seantek.com> <A8355357-1E8B-446D-8FE7-EBA411122814@gmail.com> <263ddb2d-c65b-00bf-d6cd-bc6f749f5c18@nic.cz> <7AA12587-E253-45CC-A3A7-AE32EDAA6A49@gmail.com> <38EDBD04-6D6D-4CD3-B186-C51624909159@gmail.com> <947826D6-4D45-4239-8631-4D9613421818@tzi.org> <CA+9_gVuCeMqzG2Odm6xnyFxQ4+RYArbOyLkiAcsSQ3C3JoyQdw@mail.gmail.com> <BCB694D7-F7D0-499D-8E5E-D4ACF36E3DDB@rfc1035.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903131303060.22356@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903131303060.22356@bofh.nohats.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f7504535-b697-4b3c-a3f1-08d6a7d719d2
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR05MB3182;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR05MB3182:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR05MB318243F46FB5F06BAFA19E16A54A0@MWHPR05MB3182.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 09752BC779
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(4326008)(446003)(2616005)(11346002)(476003)(8676002)(6916009)(478600001)(71190400001)(486006)(71200400001)(14444005)(81166006)(81156014)(256004)(83716004)(97736004)(25786009)(2906002)(316002)(7736002)(68736007)(305945005)(106356001)(105586002)(86362001)(93886005)(36756003)(186003)(53546011)(6506007)(6436002)(99286004)(6486002)(66066001)(14454004)(26005)(53936002)(5660300002)(3846002)(8936002)(33656002)(82746002)(6116002)(229853002)(76176011)(102836004)(6246003)(6512007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR05MB3182; H:MWHPR05MB3151.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:3;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: V3acynm6S10bDlV8afnHIh6i1G+vggaTULSadm8XTFT07DRWuCAmshY6k2wrDK/4CD+831RLr9PBaU6n+a9CqOY8eUNBgBiYzgzCCBMjXsQFHuktaKJ8RY5uaHw0kr2oYG99AIROfukMRsqdWRilm61UxVOkQVQWyymb6ZvKrHS83mXlGN75u+r/MzgJQBLC4QHhOfxc7JDLMDQoGOtc12Clu3g5z2oTK8iSEDWFAdI5Ucqx6jz4v2E1GQ4HIaCMFDgHcpfRtx89Lj+jTFxmKnM5QRki8UwcYhMn1qDqmyXsJ7P5CV5iQQrrg6CSSWzazEQhtBGKBdon3tMkruN7sY1ywvX4YZokkGpYKcHzZw0/UX5A4dEVS7I52q7quJihF+JtGSOicJNEE81VzLe4rDui8y0MkAXU09gIrs/bkRQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CB77D7986D71C34185774A2AA6D43B97@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f7504535-b697-4b3c-a3f1-08d6a7d719d2
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Mar 2019 17:12:41.1805 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR05MB3182
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-13_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903130120
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/104attendees/jNZaQFlqcbhCV4XeAoKAel1pvY8>
Subject: Re: [104attendees] an IETF in India
X-BeenThere: 104attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 104 attendees for official communication <104attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/104attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:104attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:12:56 -0000

> On Mar 13, 2019, at 13:07, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Jim Reid wrote:
> 
>>> Curious if any cities in India have been considered.
>> 
>> If they have, I expect they’d be quickly eliminated. All foreign visitors have to get a visa to visit India and the application process is painful. Former colleagues have spent a day waiting in the queue at the embassy to hand in their paperwork and then do that all over again to pick up the visa.
> 
> That's pretty obsolete information. The electronic visa thing works fine
> now. I did have one odd thing only, as a european, the instructions were
> to print my documents on A4 paper. Being in Canada, that turned out to
> be harder than expected, unless I was willing to commit to buying a few
> realms of paper. I called the consulate to confirm and they did
> recommend sticking to A4, so I artisanly cut some paper :)

I've traveled to India twice on e-visas.  Once I found a good place to do the process, it was fairly straight forward.

The instructions you find in various places to do this process are massively contradictory and confusing.

Given how much noise there was around the Thailand visa stuff, we'll want to get the conflicting information streamlined if we're considering India.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email