IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [3gv6] Stateless Prefix Delegation I-D updated (draft-savolainen-stateless-pd)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 02 March 2010 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: 3gv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 3gv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A6F3A8B9D for <3gv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:45:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPdTOkkBzkwr for <3gv6@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:45:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D320F3A8B57 for <3gv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1DB0D9E; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:45:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB819C; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:45:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:45:17 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Konrad Rosenbaum <konrad@silmor.de>
In-Reply-To: <ab1c41801a9af836af3e300b4d3a6cce.squirrel@squirrel.six.silmor.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1003021943420.11822@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <1267309761.3168.5.camel@Nokia-N900-51-1> <08c08ee106e47b366ab18ca2f0a9a722.squirrel@squirrel.six.silmor.de> <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F589C9BCEE7@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com> <ab1c41801a9af836af3e300b4d3a6cce.squirrel@squirrel.six.silmor.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org, otroan@employees.org, 3gv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [3gv6] Stateless Prefix Delegation I-D updated (draft-savolainen-stateless-pd)
X-BeenThere: 3gv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This mailing list is intended for discussions relating to the use of IPv6 in cellular networks." <3gv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/3gv6>, <mailto:3gv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/3gv6>
List-Post: <mailto:3gv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:3gv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/3gv6>, <mailto:3gv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:45:22 -0000

On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:

> However the Access Concentrator has to deal with a paradoxical 
> situation: several overlapping routes. If we assume the AC has host-ID 
> ::1 and the CPE device or mobile phone has ::2:

Hm, I don't really endorse this model (I prefer the WAN interface 
unnumbered model), but I don't understand why this overlapping routes 
situation is paradoxical?

Longest prefix routing is the norm on the Internet and should handle this 
just fine?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email