Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast

Rex Buddenberg <buddenbergr@gmail.com> Thu, 30 December 2021 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <buddenbergr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6gip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F1D3A1368 for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:56:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mHd3wICCmQ8T for <6gip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:56:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A68E93A1366 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id p14so18625003plf.3 for <6gip@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:56:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=G1k1R8ieCw0b+DV9C1G55dt9aN/uNN+rsvgYxXM9C54=; b=TAB82HaTwa63bFfkMsHQqagpYrQm8MjNpbLirQSIN/NUBKi9LueGVf17xJ1RtjV0dD rsBNhiDgwHHe+pqU/pmEd7xYrmD5Oh65ehbckTLm6bbcC6ctnpFAvHXgZ4IUo5D/dhYi XesM8gMG/o/9NY6BEZwk5VMwxX414VdZy663f1jQwtxzcnVWzN6QQE2MYf+3SnTblOti 61/cy5Mfqj7Tc4om7oOJbCEX9Sa67SCXpqGfExsigAU3hZ87gBMzD0uGK5Tbasou+7RQ SjKO5xlY6kWMAEZjANgBJpCZ0UhnyvP/Ho6bSGoP9xJhTccK/b27zEq8tQ1hw1nU8Ob5 GC3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G1k1R8ieCw0b+DV9C1G55dt9aN/uNN+rsvgYxXM9C54=; b=TyVciZnW1OV//77Jqj/gaQUXFlFueiWx9eOVFZ9rfmXrF/IYg+oenytFCp0HdvR748 DZPn6XmjYTNIs/llV6+Y4mj5fqolRkZPrxgJAX+S7KLDvLPraIeC2fL2BPSzNBePHokw Ldo27KbGxrym7m+ZAIYbnsGkBRdr46xr92LtTianhZVZ1/tEOg8t5Sys/AtmDJUIhXqG g/bQwLBEN9KT88XIcKHdKeSj7KUaIhb4NLvdpIb5hyum7NLeEmYZfAeiPrroRVBGtcmT Sw9q6NnVGyzBf9M4LEG+Ajw6wkFw4fET+qWeC1xK7f+2f1Y8u+nk3UvEcBbQTB/5WCOB 9xyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530B+dBuEwW7LIyaRiznn0ooQXkJ9O0FoEnOHWl+W4DOjUS+b47z NnYgjPoPjEnQReffg3k/6E0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwA/uDjvj0pxfaC+on1rwTmzz4r8Up8OYlifjtwR3IJ2Z82Cy6tITD1PnIQbQrKm0QX7dfIcw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4482:: with SMTP id t2mr23851412pjg.133.1640883366950; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-241-197-249.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.241.197.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm21649756pgj.85.2021.12.30.08.56.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1640883365.3160.4.camel@gmail.com>
From: Rex Buddenberg <buddenbergr@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, lionel.morand@orange.com, "6gip@ietf.org" <6gip@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:56:05 -0800
In-Reply-To: <e4ac341e-0213-ad9c-fc8c-7d1e7217c7b0@gmail.com>
References: <ea10e064-df32-9a9a-b590-0be5a908d269@gmail.com> <15014_1640683978_61CAD9CA_15014_486_1_e536af4e4f3647878c89fe6a6cb31a0a@orange.com> <e4ac341e-0213-ad9c-fc8c-7d1e7217c7b0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2 (3.18.5.2-1.fc23)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6gip/0mRyPkCZFzXg-pY_1k_SEie5FGU>
Subject: Re: [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast
X-BeenThere: 6gip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Issues in 6th Generation Mobile Network System \(6gip\)" <6gip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6gip/>
List-Post: <mailto:6gip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6gip>, <mailto:6gip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:56:15 -0000

Alex

All cellphone technologies 3G and earlier were point-point, non-
routable systems. The generational changes incorporated improvements in
transmission, not switching. Circuit switch; plugged into the PSTN
(public switched telephone network).

LTE, by contrast, is a routable network segment. Packet switch. It's
plugged into the internet, not the PSTN.  This is a one-time big deal
change; the transmission did indeed change (OFDM) but the migration to
routable packet switch is more significant.
     The ballooning in internet apps occurred once cellphones became
internet nodes rather than dial-up telephones that happened to use
wireless links.

b

On Thu, 2021-12-30 at 11:06 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> Thank you very much!  I will refer to the table you posted.
> 
> Indeed the stds show a slower growth in generations.  By it, one
> could
> expect the first 6G specs published and approved (term?) at 3GPP
> maybe
> in 2032.  Because of this sequence of first specs at 3GPP: 1999 3G,
> 2008 
> 4G, 2019 5G.
> 
> This is indeed different than my speculation of dates of various
> deployment announcements - very approximative, based on personal
> rememberings.  That says 6G and 7G would be trialled before 2030,
> following an acceleration between generations.  It might be wrong.
> 
> Also, a little detail about what happened between 2G and 3G, when
> 3GPP
> did not exist.  I think 3GPP specified indeed 3G, but not 2.5G (GPRS,
> EDGE).  I think these were specified by ETSI.  If true, I am looking
> for
> ETSI dates of publication of first 2G, GPRS and EDGE standards.  Just
> for information.
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 28/12/2021 à 10:32, lionel.morand@orange.com a écrit :
> > 
> > Bonjour Alexandre,
> > 
> > For a more accurate forecast, you should consider standard
> > releases 
> > (3GPP/IUT) rather than announced commercial rollouts (for which
> > some
> > of them were kind of “fake news”, i.e. claiming being 4G whereas it
> > was only 3G+, same for 5G).
> > 
> > For 3GPP, it is important to check the exact content of each
> > release.
> > 
> > Here is a brief summary for 3GPP:
> > 
> > 5G
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 16
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2020-07-03 (SA#88-e)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Phase 2
> > 
> > Release 15
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2019-03-22 (SA#83)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Phase 1 (New radio and http-based core)
> > 
> > 4G
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 14
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2017-03-10 (SA#75)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 13
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2015-12-11 (SA#70)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 12
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2014-09-17 (SA#65)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 11
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2012-09-12 (SA#57)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 10
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2011-03-23 (SA#51)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 9
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2009-12-10 (SA#46)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 8
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2008-12-11 (SA#42)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > New radio and new Diameter core
> > 
> > 3G
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 7
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2007-03-15 (SA#35)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 6
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2005-03-17 (SA#27)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 5
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2002-03-14 (SA-#15)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Introduction of SIP-based IP Multimedia system
> > 
> > Release 4
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 2001-03-22 (SA-#11)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 2000
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Release 1999
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 1999-12-17 (SA-#6)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > UMTS
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 1999-02-12 (SMG-#28)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > New Radio
> > 
> > Therefore, you can see that there are:
> > 
> > 9 years between 3G and 4G
> > 
> > 11 years between 4G and 5G
> > 
> > What is true is that discussions on the next generation start
> > sooner
> > and sooner generation after generation.
> > 
> > My2Cts,
> > 
> > Lionel
> > 
> > Orange Restricted
> > 
> > *De :* 6gip <6gip-bounces@ietf.org> *De la part de* Alexandre
> > Petrescu *Envoyé :* lundi 27 décembre 2021 21:04 *À :* 6gip@ietf.or
> > g 
> > *Objet :* [6gip] xG evolution by years, and a forecast
> > 
> > Hi, 6GIP,
> > 
> > I did recently a small research of when the various generations
> > (2G,
> > 3G, etc.) appeared and tried to identify the tendency in order to
> > make a forecast.
> > 
> > 2G - 1991, operator Radiolinja in Finland
> > 
> > 3G - 2005, operator Tre ('3') in Italy
> > 
> > 4G - 2015, various operators such as SFR and Orange in France
> > 
> > 5G - 2020, operator SFR in France
> > 
> > (the precise dates, places and status of deployment, such as trial
> > or
> >  public, are approximate and indeed debatable).
> > 
> > By this logic, it seems there is an acceleration between
> > generations.
> >  The difference between generations was: 14 years, 10 years, 5
> > years.
> > 
> > The forecast is that 6G would be expected earlier than 2025, and
> > 7G 
> > before 2030.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> > 
> > Alex
> > 
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > ______________________________________________________
> > 
> >  Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre
> > diffuses,
> > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
> > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire
> > ainsi
> > que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant
> > susceptibles
> > d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a
> > ete
> > altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> > 
> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should
> > not
> > be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have
> > received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> > this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange
> > is
> > not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or
> > falsified. Thank you.
> >