Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA5C21F85EE for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.158
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.441, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYiRr1TGKBZw for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8730721F85EC for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=pthubert@cisco.com; l=4259; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1313049870; x=1314259470; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=vzUeqovOlVZiiQ0KkYCTtFGZfTDfxMNkrTnm6c+1Yc0=; b=mvAq2NqkTJJvrab++xQXLbTJ8aA6di3oX9xuu4w/guCnYaflZGtTIxUl eamlcMcBzWOJcOC/av6iGMR79x5bdyuHYndfJl0/My5aYXWhROwXYnFvg bJliOvkeCYJYQ9rDCYu4MygQaRVd3nzL/0J1JrIBtYF5beLk+UGEWAEQc E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMAAMeMQ06Q/khL/2dsb2JhbABBl3uPTHeBQAEBAQEDEgEdCj8MBAIBCBEEAQEBCgYXAQYBRQkIAQEEARIIGodQnX0BnmmFZ18EmCKLXQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,355,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="49709886"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2011 08:04:26 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7B84QVd001290; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:04:26 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-107.cisco.com ([144.254.74.82]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:04:26 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:04:22 +0200
Message-ID: <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D05465A99@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <EC44989C-2AEB-4D9E-975A-2950E88D86D8@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>
Thread-Index: AcxXiXWhiu/d2kDjS76xsdXvy9PttQAc6Sgw
References: <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D05228480@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com> <DE69914A-2813-4044-AEA7-A716FE2157CE@tzi.org> <56748029-05E7-4B09-8C50-C9EADD5629A0@tzi.org> <430C1B59-E048-4CC7-9E75-EF4E54D1104F@amsl.com> <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D053A3C92@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com> <EC44989C-2AEB-4D9E-975A-2950E88D86D8@cisco.com>
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>, "Megan Ferguson" <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2011 08:04:26.0531 (UTC) FILETIME=[49E9E730:01CC57FD]
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, 6lowpan <6lowpan@ietf.org>, 6lowpan-ads@tools.ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 08:03:57 -0000

Hi Megan;

I do 100% agree with Ralph here. I'd prefer that we make that change
before publish. Apart from that, I'm perfectly happy with the text as it
stands.

Cheers,

Pascal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:15 PM
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> Cc: Ralph Droms (rdroms); Megan Ferguson; Carsten Bormann; 6lowpan;
RFC
> Editor; 6lowpan-ads@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282
<draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-
> 15.txt>
> 
> Following up on Pascal's observation, I looked through the entire doc
for
> occurrences of "6lopwan".  In my opinion, all of those occurrences
could be
> replaced with "IEEE802.15.4-based network"; in some cases s/the
> 6lowpan/an IEEE802.15.4-based network/   In either case, note the
lower-
> case "network".
> 
> Not meaning to delay the publication process further, but I think we
should
> take a second to consider consistency...
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 1:04 PM 8/9/11, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
> 
> > Hello Megan
> >
> > I think that for consistency:
> >
> >   LOWPAN_HC1 and LOWPAN_HC2 are insufficient for most practical uses
> of
> >   IPv6 in 6LoWPANs.  LOWPAN_HC1 is most effective for link-local
> >
> > Should also become
> >
> >   LOWPAN_HC1 and LOWPAN_HC2 are insufficient for most practical uses
> of
> >   IPv6 in IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks. LOWPAN_HC1 is most effective
> > for link-local
> >
> > Don't you think?
> >
> > Pascal
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Megan Ferguson [mailto:mferguson@amsl.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 5:02 PM
> >> To: Carsten Bormann; Ralph Droms (rdroms); Pascal Thubert
(pthubert)
> >> Cc: 6lowpan; RFC Editor; 6lowpan-ads@tools.ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282
> > <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-
> >> 15.txt>
> >>
> >> Carsten, Pascal, and *ADs,
> >>
> >> Thank you for your reply.  We have updated the title as requested.
> > Please
> >> note that we have also updated the expansion of 6LoWPAN (in the
text)
> > to
> >> match that in the title of RFC 4919.  Additionally, we have updated
> > the short
> >> title that appears in the running header of the document (this is
best
> >> reviewed in the text file below).  Please review and approve these
> > updates
> >> or let us know if a different approach in either of these
additional
> > updates
> >> would be preferable.
> >>
> >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282-lastdiff.html
> >>
> >> The text, XML, and comprehensive diff files are viewable at:
> >>
> >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282.txt
> >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282.xml
> >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282-diff.html
> >>
> >> Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to
view
> >> the most recent version of the document.  Please review the
document
> >> carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once the
> >> document has been published as an RFC.
> >>
> >> Upon careful review, please contact us with any further updates or
> > with
> >> your approval of the document in its current form.
> >>
> >> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> >>
> >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc6282
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> RFC Editor/mf
> >>
> >> On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> >>
> >>> OK, I have reread all the messages, and I'm now ready to declare a
> > (rough)
> >> consensus for
> >>>
> >>> 	Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-based
> >> Networks
> >>>
> >>> (with an ever so slight edge for the -based, which is different
from
> > RFC
> >> 4944, but "Datagrams" is different, too).
> >>>
> >>> While there were a number of voices for keeping 6LoWPAN in the
title
> > (as
> >> in RFC 4919), there did not seem to be consensus for that.
> >>>
> >>> I apologize for holding up this RFC for so long for what is pretty
> > much a
> >> bikeshed color issue.
> >>>
> >>> And, yes, I'm slowly getting back to IETF work, and will try to
> > start popping
> >> the stack.
> >>>
> >>> Gruesse, Carsten
> >>>
> >