Re: [6lowpan] Working-Group Last Call for draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-06

[JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On Nov 9, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:

> Eunah,
> Thanks for taking care of these editorial comments.
> 
> The document is certainly nearly ready to go to the IESG and the
> shepherd document is complete.  There are a couple of "nits" that need
> to be addressed before I can send it to our ADs. Enuah, I will send you
> the list of "nits" in my next message.
> 
> Additionally, I was informed last night (thanks Jonathan and Pete) that
> I had not answered a number of messages from JP about this document.  It
> would appear that in my move to use Google to filter my email, it
> (Google) decided to categorize all of JP's messages to me as SPAM - I
> think that I've corrected that situation.  This message should answer
> JP's questions regarding the status of the document.  In the future,
> remember that there are two WG Chairs, if for some reason I'm not
> responding to a message.

Ah thanks for the clarifications, I was wondering why you were not responding most
emails for several years now ... you may want to check since I've been told that others
had the same issue ... 

:-)

> 
> 	geoff
> 
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 20:56 +0100, Eunsook "Eunah" Kim wrote:
>> Dear Paul,
>> 
>> First of all, I'm very sorry for the late responding.
>> I highly appreciate on your detail comments.
>> I just uploaded the new version fixing the editorial errors you commented.
>> You will find the new version at
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases/
>> 
>> Thanks again for the valuable review.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Eunah
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Paul Chilton <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> I think the draft is well written and contains valuable information.  It
>>> should be submitted to the IESG after the following editorial changes are
>>> made:
>>> 
>>> Nits
>>> P1, L24 r/characterisitcis/characteristics
>>> P1, L24 r/dimention/dimension
>>> P4, L24 "...details of the each..." - remove "each"
>>> P4, L35 r/arbitary/arbitrary
>>> P9, L30 r/boold/blood
>>> P10, L30 "In case that..." - replace with "In the case that..."
>>> P10, L39 "In Mesh Under, more than one LMs  are selected for multi-hop
>>> transmission and the nodes MAY also play role in transmission multi-point
>>> traffic (multicast) by unicast method, not only role in data collection."
>>> Sentence is unclear
>>> P11, L7 "The data volume is usually not so big in this case, but data is
>>> sensitive for delay." replace with "The volume of data volume is usually not
>>> large in this case, but is sensitive to delay."
>>> P11, L23 "In case..." replace with "In the case..."
>>> P11, L25 r/typle/type
>>> P12, L25 "such as fire alarm" add "such as a fire alarm"
>>> P12, L25 "...MUST be handled in very critical manner." replace with "...MUST
>>> be handled in a very critical manner. "
>>> P12, L38 "...do not move..."  replace with "...are immobile..."
>>> P13, L50 r/acheived/achieved
>>> P15, L31 remove "...of the Grid network..."
>>> P15, L46 "...a few dozen of nodes..." remove "of"
>>> P16, L52 "...LBR provides connectivities to the outside of LoWPAN..."
>>> replace with "...LBR  provides connectivity to the outside world..."
>>> P17, L37 r/LoPWAN/LoWPAN
>>> P21, L52 r/failure/fails
>>> Regards
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> Paul Chilton
>>> Low Power RF Solutions (formerly Jennic Ltd)
>>> NXP Semiconductors NV
>>> Furnival Street, Sheffield, S1 4QT, UK
>>> Tel: [phone]
>>> Fax: [phone]
>>> Comp Reg No: 3191371   Registered In England
>>> http://www.nxp.com     http://www.jennic.com
>>> ____________________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> 
>>> LoWPANners,
>>> as you know, the working group chairs dropped the ball on the usecases
>>> document.
>>> A version with fixes resulting from the WGLC issued on 2009-01-09 was
>>> submitted on 2009-10-02. We wanted to get some quick feedback on
>>> whether that was fixing the issues and then never actually issued the
>>> second working-group last call.  Indeed, the Internet-Draft expired
>>> after six months...  Then the terminology of the ND draft changed.
>>> Since the usecases draft now has been resubmitted with updated
>>> terminology:
>>> This is a Working-Group Last-Call for:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases-06
>>> The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the
>>> IESG for publication as an Informational Document.
>>> This is a one-week Working-Group Last-Call, ending on 2010-08-09
>>> (Monday, August 09, 2010) at 2359 UTC.
>>> Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your
>>> comments to the 6lowpan list.  Please also indicate in your response
>>> whether or not you think this document is ready to go to the IESG.
>>> Carsten and Geoff
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 6lowpan mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 6lowpan mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>>> 
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowpan mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan