Re: [6lowpan] Ready for WGLC? (Re: Latest version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft)

Samita Chakrabarti <> Sat, 10 September 2011 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A79721F87FC for <>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.605
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhuwTmpX7noJ for <>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C898C21F8540 for <>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) by (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p8A0EuXw027275; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 19:14:58 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:14:55 -0400
From: Samita Chakrabarti <>
To: Carsten Bormann <>, "" <>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:14:54 -0400
Thread-Topic: [6lowpan] Ready for WGLC? (Re: Latest version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft)
Thread-Index: Acxu7g82IsE0T0bwQDmqPIpgY0JV1QAYC0ug
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Ready for WGLC? (Re: Latest version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:13:03 -0000

Hi Carsten,

I think this draft is interesting and important too.
I am reviewing this draft and have some comments on the editorial and some technical clarification.
Will be sending comments to the authors.


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 5:43 AM
Subject: [6lowpan] Ready for WGLC? (Re: Latest version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft)


we are now looking at the third WG version (-02) of this draft.

Are we ready to do a working-group last-call on this?

-- if you see something major that needs to be done before this is ready, please speak up now.
   (If you have technical comments, or maybe some editorial suggestions, these are also useful at this point, although there also will be time to comment in the actual WGLC.)

-- conversely, if you have reviewed the document and like it, please do speak up (and please do say what you have specifically looked at).

Of course, we don't want to go into a WGLC with glaring omissions (I gather Appendix A is not really a necessary part of this spec), and we also don't want to go into WGLC if the working group hasn't been able to review the document or, worse, if nobody actually cares.

Please respond to this message by Sep 16.

Gruesse, Carsten

6lowpan mailing list