Re: [6lowpan] Ready for WGLC? (Re: Latest version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft)

Hi Carsten,

I think this draft is interesting and important too.
I am reviewing this draft and have some comments on the editorial and some technical clarification.
Will be sending comments to the authors.

Thanks,
-Samita 

-----Original Message-----
From: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 5:43 AM
To: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: [6lowpan] Ready for WGLC? (Re: Latest version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft)

6LoWPANners,

we are now looking at the third WG version (-02) of this draft.

Are we ready to do a working-group last-call on this?

-- if you see something major that needs to be done before this is ready, please speak up now.
   (If you have technical comments, or maybe some editorial suggestions, these are also useful at this point, although there also will be time to comment in the actual WGLC.)

-- conversely, if you have reviewed the document and like it, please do speak up (and please do say what you have specifically looked at).

Of course, we don't want to go into a WGLC with glaring omissions (I gather Appendix A is not really a necessary part of this spec), and we also don't want to go into WGLC if the working group hasn't been able to review the document or, worse, if nobody actually cares.

Please respond to this message by Sep 16.

Gruesse, Carsten

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan