IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] slot for New Version of draft-qiu-roll-kemp-02.txt

QIU Ying <qiuying@i2r.a-star.edu.sg> Mon, 29 October 2012 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <qiuying@i2r.a-star.edu.sg>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CBB21F86F0; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Gv5GSQZqe97; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw2.scei.a-star.edu.sg (gw2.scei.a-star.edu.sg [192.122.140.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CF521F86E5; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (gw2 [127.0.0.1]) by gw2.scei.a-star.edu.sg (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q9TGcVH5001928; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:42:45 +0800
Received: from s3-cas05.shared-svc.local ([10.217.253.201]) by gw2.scei.a-star.edu.sg with ESMTP id 189vx1018p-1; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:42:45 +0800
Received: from Win7PC (10.217.253.130) by S3-CAS05.shared-svc.local (10.217.253.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.339.1; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:42:45 +0800
From: QIU Ying <qiuying@i2r.a-star.edu.sg>
To: 'Michael Richardson' <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, sarikaya@ieee.org
References: <015901cdb0d3$d38cf1f0$7aa6d5d0$@a-star.edu.sg> <CAC8QAccHFddngBnWynnVbSc=hhwbCmXbh9QRo=jcqPxfGYeiHg@mail.gmail.com> <1116.1351177270@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1116.1351177270@sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:49:09 +0800
Message-ID: <02a101cdb5f5$51109a70$f331cf50$@a-star.edu.sg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac2y+eJ8zB/KFlDFQnGBF/2JcO4RVwC9yeiA
Content-Language: en-sg
X-Originating-IP: [10.217.253.130]
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855, 1.0.431, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-10-29_02:2012-10-29, 2012-10-29, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1210290171
Cc: roll@ietf.org, "'Keoh, Sye Loong'" <sye.loong.keoh@philips.com>, 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] slot for New Version of draft-qiu-roll-kemp-02.txt
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:42:55 -0000

Hi, Behcet

Initially, I was also confusing which WG is best for this kind solution. The
draft finally settled down in the ROLL WG because, at that time, there were
many RFCs in ROLL WG about the requirements for LL networks and the KEMP
draft is designed to provide a security solution to meet the requirements
mentioned in these RFCs.

Regards
Qiu Ying


> -----Original Message-----
> From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Richardson
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:01 PM
> To: sarikaya@ieee.org
> Cc: roll@ietf.org; Keoh, Sye Loong; 6lowpan@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lowpan] slot for New Version of draft-qiu-roll-
> kemp-02.txt
> 
> 
> Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
>     BS> There is some overlap with this draft and our work on Secure
>     BS> Bootstrapping that was being pursued until recently in Core WG.
> 
>     BS> It is still not clear to me which WG should be home for this
> activity,
>     BS> can you please clarify?
> 
> I thought that this was the point of SOLACE.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson
> -on the road-
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email