IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 08 September 2016 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B1012B2FF for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0VhJdX8_TVI for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A478912B31A for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032F72009E; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:30:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85936392D; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3F738FE.3A41FC%shwethab@cisco.com>
References: <1341829088.7730.1472216374565.JavaMail.open-xchange@webmail.cdac.in> <57C6C853.7090809@ece.iisc.ernet.in> <015b01d20383$6f8baeb0$4ea30c10$@cdac.in> <CADJ9OA-i-U42d6aU269s_ScfYnp4yyoHuzceZDShFg7SyP7qjw@mail.gmail.com> <D3F738FE.3A41FC%shwethab@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:17:56 -0400
Message-ID: <16407.1473340676@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/7ll_Urmw0D5HgnlXTwqe0kErEjg>
Cc: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 13:28:56 -0000

Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab) <shwethab@cisco.com> wrote:
    > Yes, if it is v6 then hbh option -
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-inband-oam-transport-01#section-3.1

    > For Lijo’s use-case the below proposal was to define a new type in hbh option
    > defined here -
    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-inband-oam-data-01#section-3.3

1) make sure the option is set to be ignored if not understood.
2) when adding the option, an IPIP header is needed, so this will affect
   compression rates if an IPIP header isn't already required for another
   RPL artifact.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email