IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal (was: internded status for draft minimal)

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 30 November 2015 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFF31B29E5 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:43:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZEiSZkCq0Idk for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8B0D1A1A24 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:43:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3154; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1448905425; x=1450115025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=7u2l3M1iYCgoNMpZlVYeRmP3eD3E+jwKpfFgXkdHGnk=; b=E0ZiaphwF5cFUTi3oimFJUAbX+yQQvhAEJo4gICfWTO7oJ9UwiXufhPI tluh2TejTmrQ0qyHmcBon5K9dCgZkMarnkaftgRmccZysFJYaQQb8q54U JdGZ+H/s/wWjV6Dm3Fy6yrKZM+CerYWEOKhyZzSTe6Y7n3fIOf8cqumY+ Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D/AQDSiVxW/5xdJa1egztTbwa+KQENgWYhhW4CHIEXOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQQjEUARBAIBCBEEAQEDAh8EAwICAh8RFAEICAIEARIIiBEDEg2qLIt8DYRRAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFASBAYVThH6CU4F1gy2BRAWHSo8NAYUphheBcJURh1YBHwEBQoJEgUByAYRpgQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,365,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="212577444"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Nov 2015 17:43:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAUHhiwf027956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:43:44 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:43:44 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:43:44 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "xvilajosana@gmail.com" <xvilajosana@gmail.com>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal (was: internded status for draft minimal)
Thread-Index: AQHRK2qgb1lG0kg72k2qwptIbnL9A5600ggw
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:43:28 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:42:44 +0000
Message-ID: <a864c3f122d24d638adf712ed92054cd@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <060.92a20915e49c32f8bffbbbb0b4a66869@tools.ietf.org> <075.1f97e51c53b1c124937a2b6c7fca39d7@tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <075.1f97e51c53b1c124937a2b6c7fca39d7@tools.ietf.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/OE8QJgGiDMjk1lBmf17L00TAZVA>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal (was: internded status for draft minimal)
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:43:47 -0000

Dear all:

I created that issue to follow up on whether standard track is really the intention for this document or, as Suresh and Brian suggest, we would explore an alternative, BCP or informational.
At the call, there was a sense that informational was not the right path, and that std track was slightly preferred. If that is so, we must now make the case in the shepherd writeup and defend it in front of the IESG. I would like that we explorein depth the pros and cons of each, and we really want all the arguments on the table.

What I have so far:

1) minimal is a base that we expect will operate in many networks since it appears to be needed to build the next stage where dedicated time slots can be negotiated. Apparently this pleads against informational
2) minimal is a recommendation for device builders, as opposed to network admin. Apparently this pleads for std track rather than BCP
3) minimal defines a way to compute the Rank that cannot be obtained with a simple parameter in an existing implementation. The operation SHOULD be programmed in the device for interoperation and that operation is not specified in a preexisting RFC. This pleads for std track

What else?

Pascal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6tisch issue tracker [mailto:trac+6tisch@tools.ietf.org]
> Sent: lundi 30 novembre 2015 13:29
> To: xvilajosana@gmail.com; Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
> Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal (was:
> internded status for draft minimal)
> 
> #41: intended status for draft minimal
> 
> 
> --
> -----------------------------------+------------------------------------
>  Reporter:  pthubert@cisco.com     |       Owner:  xvilajosana@gmail.com
>      Type:  defect                 |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  major                  |   Milestone:  milestone1
> Component:  minimal                |     Version:  1.0
>  Severity:  Submitted WG Document  |  Resolution:
>  Keywords:                         |
> -----------------------------------+------------------------------------
> 
> Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/trac/ticket/41#comment:2>
> 6tisch <https://tools.ietf.org/6tisch/>
> IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email