IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...

Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com> Thu, 13 March 2008 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD9C28C19E; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iba+RhS8KoS8; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFCB28C1A6; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E394228C161 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQ1rIe6e-lEU for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pingtel.com (host117.155.212.198.conversent.net [155.212.198.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3E73A6B5A for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ssh.pingtel.com [10.1.20.8]) by mail.pingtel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20FF6C017; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:57:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Dale Worley <dworley@pingtel.com>
To: Dan York <dyork@voxeo.com>
In-Reply-To: <6D604FA0-B7EE-4225-9F03-9E2A603A0866@voxeo.com>
References: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660203A5B212@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com> <6D604FA0-B7EE-4225-9F03-9E2A603A0866@voxeo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:57:19 -0400
Message-Id: <1205434639.3774.2.camel@maine.pingtel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:49:28 -0700
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: [71attendees] Network Utilization - Let's See Some...
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:40 -0400, Dan York wrote:
> Given that 100 GBps divided by 1200 attendees equals about 80 MBps for
> EACH attendee, how exactly would you suggest we suck up all that
> bandwidth?  (And there's probably under 1,000 people left, so it more
> like 100+ MBps per attendee.)

100 GB/sec?  How did we get a feeder like that into the building???

Dale


_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email