Re: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 11 March 2008 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <71attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-71attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FCE28C51F; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKvPbGILW2Sw; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9470228C526; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 71attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E177A3A6824 for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9VCLRPIuzRPc for <71attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD4828C640 for <71attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-14c9.ietf71.ietf.org (dhcp-14c9.ietf71.ietf.org [130.129.20.201]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460CC29E1473; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <430F5C13-8F68-495B-99EE-99026C0E8D59@viagenie.ca>
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155708508D@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:20:47 -0400
References: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155708508D@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: 71attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [71attendees] IPv6 Jabber Identity server anyone?
X-BeenThere: 71attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF Meeting 71 attendees <71attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:71attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees>, <mailto:71attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0273305380=="
Sender: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 71attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Le 08-03-11 à 15:59, Hallam-Baker, Phillip a écrit :
> Issues discovered (OS/X Lepoard on a MacBook Air):
>
> 1) Firefox does not allow an IPv6 URL to be entered into the address  
> bar, fe80::... was turned into http://www.fe80.com/...
>
have you tried http://[fe80::...] ?  i.e. enclosing into brackets?
RFC2732 for the specific info; RFC3986 for the merged URI
>
> 2) iChat and Adium were both unable to connect to my gmail identity  
> server so I was unable to connect to any chat room whatsoever.
>
> Conclusion: Not only does it not work,
>
well, if a server is only ipv4 (as the gmail identity server you are  
referring to), then obviously on an ipv6-only network, you won't be  
connected to it.

> the level of user intervention required is such that I am going to  
> have to retreat to a small desert island (no Internet) during the  
> transition phase or spend 110% of my time fixing the transition  
> problems of all my relatives. Might as well be using IPv8...
>
> This has to be completely transparent to the end user.
>
agree. in dual-stack scenarios, this is transparent. this experiment  
(v6only) pushes the envelop for v6-only deployments.

Marc.

> The current scheme requires double ended adoption before IPv6 gives  
> me the same level of usability as IPv4.
>
> _______________________________________________
> 71attendees mailing list
> 71attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees

-----
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley, 2006, http://www.ipv6book.ca


_______________________________________________
71attendees mailing list
71attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/71attendees