Re: [72attendees] Not a complaint

Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> 
> 
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 4:54 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> 
>> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>> In testing on Sunday, I had more signal power in the Hotel Foyer area 
>>> with cgnat than
>>> with ietf or ietf-a. Here in Ballroom 1 the power seems adequate in 
>>> both of those. BTW,
>>> my box is green on www.sixxs.net.
>>
>> This is a product of the client's scanning implementation rapidly 
>> jumping through channels...
>>
> 
> Well, maybe so, but on Sunday in the foyer I had 1 bar and couldn't even 
> ssh to my servers on ietf or ietf-a,
> while ietf-cgnat was fine in both power and connectivity.

The two A only ssids are A-only and since it attenuates more 
dramatically than the 2.4ghz b/g channels I imagine there are a number 
of situations where the a/b/g/n ssids are more visible than the a/n only 
ssids.

It's something of a rich target environment if you wander around with a 
snooper you'll some 600 discreet stations beaconed from 120 radios on 60 
ap's.

With the passing of most of the orinoco cards and the arrival of N in a 
big way we may have passed from one "interesting" set of client driver 
interaction issues to another.
_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees