Re: [72attendees] Not a complaint

On Jul 30, 2008, at 4:54 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:

> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> In testing on Sunday, I had more signal power in the Hotel Foyer  
>> area with cgnat than
>> with ietf or ietf-a. Here in Ballroom 1 the power seems adequate in  
>> both of those. BTW,
>> my box is green on www.sixxs.net.
>
> This is a product of the client's scanning implementation rapidly  
> jumping through channels...
>

Well, maybe so, but on Sunday in the foyer I had 1 bar and couldn't  
even ssh to my servers on ietf or ietf-a,
while ietf-cgnat was fine in both power and connectivity.

Regards
Marshall

> All 6 ssids are available and beaconed on every ap deployed.
>
>> I personally was pleased to see softwires working.
>> Regards
>> Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wiki.tools.isoc.org/IETF71_IPv4_Outage
>>>
>>> and I've added this link to meeting.ietf.org
>>>
>>> - Lucy
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 29, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 29 jul 2008, at 17:11, Lucy Lynch wrote:
>>>>>> please open a ticket by either going to:
>>>>>> http://meeting.ietf.org
>>>>>> or by sending email to: help@meeting.ietf.org
>>>>> Are others also seeing issues? Please email me offlist in that  
>>>>> case and I'll open a ticked.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> 72attendees mailing list
>>>>> 72attendees@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
>>>>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 72attendees mailing list
>>> 72attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
>> _______________________________________________
>> 72attendees mailing list
>> 72attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
>

_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees