Re: [72attendees] Not a complaint

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 29 July 2008 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8126D3A69A2; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176743A68C8 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3R0adA33MeGz for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (dlpdemo.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA553A6814 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (Postfix, from userid 105) id 33FEE294001; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:57:21 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EC6200D71; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:55:32 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from [172.31.21.91] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m6TMtTjI023401; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:55:30 +0300 (IDT)
Message-Id: <50673E5C-DACD-42FC-87BB-D9D88A4B1B32@checkpoint.com>
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <AFBDB00E-BE36-4798-9669-444F80312235@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:55:28 +0100
References: <BEF70836-D1EE-4162-BD1B-810FD69ADEA5@muada.com> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0807290910140.10951@hiroshima.bogus.com> <AFBDB00E-BE36-4798-9669-444F80312235@muada.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Not a complaint
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0666071533=="
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

I couldn't get anything from the 'ietf' network. However, the cgnat  
network worked fine for me (I have a Mac)

For a friend with Windows XP, it didn't work at all.

On Jul 29, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 29 jul 2008, at 17:11, Lucy Lynch wrote:
>
>> please open a ticket by either going to:
>
>> http://meeting.ietf.org
>
>> or by sending email to: help@meeting.ietf.org
>
> Are others also seeing issues? Please email me offlist in that case  
> and I'll open a ticked.
> _______________________________________________
> 72attendees mailing list
> 72attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>

_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees