IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Tue, 28 July 2009 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53F13A6EAF for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id go6Y8NWTHvJc for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [83.149.65.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58BB3A6EAD for <75attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-55f3.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-55f3.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.85.243] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6SBjgB7075528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:45:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <B586EC41-F953-4B15-A278-6F13B72CF68D@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06250100c694904384c2@[130.129.22.212]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--108596728"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:45:42 +0200
References: <87prblgxjn.fsf@tower.fukt.bsnet.se> <4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B-8E6C-B9D285DF237F@muada.com> <p0625011bc69462be37e5@[10.4.39.11]> <B575FAE6-39E3-4DDE-B59F-A95E7E731309@muada.com> <p06250100c694904384c2@[130.129.22.212]>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.0 (v56)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: 75attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??
X-BeenThere: 75attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <75attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/75attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:75attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:46:03 -0000

On 28 jul 2009, at 13:28, Pete Resnick wrote:

> If I wanted to know whether who the government thinks a person is,  
> I'd have asked the government to sign their key. I'll ask you to  
> sign if I want to know if *you* know who the person is. "The person  
> I've seen at the IETF who keeps wearing the Iljitsch badge" is close  
> enough for me.

So why not sign the key without the person and the badge? Isn't it  
good enough to know the link between the key and the email address?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email