IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Tue, 28 July 2009 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8A13A6D45 for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nB0xoReJqgug for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5AB3A6D3C for <75attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1248768805; x=1280304805; h=mime-version:x-sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references: user-agent:date:to:from:subject:cc:content-type: x-ironport-av; z=MIME-Version:=201.0|X-Sender:=20presnick@resnick1.qualco mm.com@resnick1.qualcomm.com|Message-ID:=20<p0625011bc694 62be37e5@[10.4.39.11]>|In-Reply-To:=20<4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B -8E6C-B9D285DF237F@muada.com>|References:=20<87prblgxjn.f sf@tower.fukt.bsnet.se>=0D=0A=20<4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B-8E6C- B9D285DF237F@muada.com>|User-Agent:=20Eudora=206.2.5b1(Ma cintosh)|Date:=20Tue,=2028=20Jul=202009=2010:13:18=20+020 0|To:=20Iljitsch=20van=20Beijnum=20<iljitsch@muada.com> |From:=20Pete=20Resnick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com> |Subject:=20Re:=20[75attendees]=20No=20PGP=20Key=20Signin g=20session??|CC:=20Teddy=20Hogeborn=20<teddy+75ietf@fukt .bsnet.se>,=20<75attendees@ietf.org>|Content-Type:=20text /plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee=3Bi=3D"5300,2777,5690"=3B=20 a=3D"21332496"; bh=8KEXQ+L6KV2t3AR+29LWE3SQNqkpIQUJYh3uBSeaAGE=; b=hyUb6WjkkiklyRcyL5eOlrlWH/OJhHE846LcdohNh7yQUPJzcIAmQg6N /uG1GsS/s1hME6cl3TssQst8UKkq/Ix+01Gj44iGkT2S0F8f9btGDBZmA 6rplwPWZqWeEE5rw5ZVZCxb7vcTBPmz4/1OhjQXHyAK8F8mqkO0NJLZT3 s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5690"; a="21332496"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO ithilien.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Jul 2009 01:13:25 -0700
Received: from msgtransport05.qualcomm.com (msgtransport05.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.150]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id n6S8DObG005435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:13:24 -0700
Received: from nasanexhub02.na.qualcomm.com (nasanexhub02.na.qualcomm.com [10.46.143.120]) by msgtransport05.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id n6S8DOwl026487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:13:24 -0700
Received: from nasanexmsp01.na.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) by nasanexhub02.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.143.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.358.0; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:13:23 -0700
Received: from [10.4.39.11] (10.46.82.6) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.340.0; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:13:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: presnick@resnick1.qualcomm.com@resnick1.qualcomm.com
Message-ID: <p0625011bc69462be37e5@[10.4.39.11]>
In-Reply-To: <4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B-8E6C-B9D285DF237F@muada.com>
References: <87prblgxjn.fsf@tower.fukt.bsnet.se> <4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B-8E6C-B9D285DF237F@muada.com>
User-Agent: Eudora 6.2.5b1(Macintosh)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:13:18 +0200
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: 75attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??
X-BeenThere: 75attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <75attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/75attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:75attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:13:24 -0000

On 7/28/09 at 9:22 AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

>What I understand is that there is no checking of government IDs at 
>theses IETF PGP signing sessions. That doesn't seem very useful to 
>me...

I think checking government IDs is a TERRIBLE idea (though you are 
certainly allowed to do so). When I sign a key, I am saying that *I* 
know the person. I am not saying that I am an expert in determining 
forged or true government IDs and that I see that this person has a 
valid one. Personally, if I think you have signed someone's key 
because you checked their government ID, I will not trust your 
signature.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email