Re: [85attendees] Great meeting venue

Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org> Thu, 08 November 2012 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rvdp@rvdp.org>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B7B21F89D0 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:11:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nITn763QC9bj for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:11:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kirk.rvdp.org (kirk.rvdp.org [IPv6:2001:610:108:87::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE1821F89B3 for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kirk.rvdp.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kirk.rvdp.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA8JAluc091556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:10:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rvdp@kirk.rvdp.org)
Received: (from rvdp@localhost) by kirk.rvdp.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA8JAlB1091555; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:10:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rvdp)
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:10:44 -0500
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20121108191044.GA4278@rvdp.org>
References: <CAGMrWUqCe5TXUEtOZ+PKJQWLm_Q+F5p9scH_=MQYAaBUX4e5Lw@mail.gmail.com> <38D6F574-12F1-4D3A-BBEC-44DFD73A57BB@fugue.com> <43F553AB-8BFB-44E7-851F-AEF0C81B7E7E@tzi.org> <11C51A7D-7743-44C0-B8CF-22C9E8A84A9C@nominet.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <11C51A7D-7743-44C0-B8CF-22C9E8A84A9C@nominet.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "85attendees@ietf.org" <85attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [85attendees] Great meeting venue
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:11:04 -0000

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 18:59:38 +0000, Ray Bellis wrote:

> One minor criticism (already reported to the organisers) is that the projectors in the large Salon rooms are invisible from the back, even with 20:20 vision.
> 
> Larger screens would help, but the ceilings are too low to permit it.
> 
> If those rooms are to be used in that configuration again I would strongly recommend some repeater screens further back in the room.

Don't we already have dozens of repeater screens? And I guess most
laptops/tablets have a higher resolution than the beamer :-)

	rvdp